Structural Racism

1238 Words3 Pages

According to the Institute on Race and Poverty (IRP) in 2000 a white individual making the same income annually as any other race has a 78-percent chance of owning a home, and only a 22-percent chance of having their credit denied on a loan, however, minorities like Blacks and Hispanics have a significantly lower chance of both. (Lawrence, and Keleher 3). In fact, Blacks with those same specifications only have a 48-percent chance to own a home, and an astounding 45-percent chance to have their credit denied on a loan. Meanwhile, Hispanics have a 46-percent chance to own a home, and a 31-percent chance of having their credit denied. While this may seem overtly discriminatory with just a glance, one must first delve into what …show more content…

Yet, that is racism at its simplest capacity, just the idea of it. However, when racism becomes more than the idea, and gets involved in the culture, policies, and history of a country, it becomes institutional and structural racism. Which is a problem that has beleaguered the United States ever since its inception and inevitably will for the future. This problem is not represented any better than by the aforementioned statistics from the IRP that illustrated that even when given precisely similar conditions Whites have a significant advantage over Blacks and Hispanics, at least in the financial and housing markets. Unlike what those numbers represent, in no way are they biased or discriminatory since they are based purely on “same incomes” by individuals. Nevertheless, one could suggest that the organization that released those numbers was only doing so to further their own agenda supporting two specific races, Black and Hispanics. In fact, it is rare that one will ever see an anti-racism organization like the IRP or National Association for Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) ever release statistics or statements that Black and Hispanics are in …show more content…

Ranging from law-enforcement racially profiling and killing Blacks and Hispanics, Donald Trump—A multi-billionaire, and 2016 presidential candidate, who currently leads most “polls”—calling all illegal Hispanic immigrants rapists and thugs as well as proposing that Mexico be forced to pay for a “Great Wall of America”, and the recent Dylann Roof and Bryce Williams atrocities. These incidents as well as many others have led to racial tensions in the United States becoming more enflamed than they have been for nearly 50 years. Quite frankly, the United States is a cesspool of controversy right now in so many ways whether it is racism, homosexuality, government data mining programs, or deflated footballs, it is also lending to a volatile environment full of deferring opinions and ideas. What exacerbates these problems even further is the fact that many of the opinions are emotionally fueled, which tends to create its own problems on its own. Someone who is emotional about a topic typically will not give up until they have won, or they feel that they have won, even if this means committing a crime to get revenge or to “prove a point.” This is precisely what happened in the recent case of Bryce Williams, a Black man who killed Alison Parker, a news reporter, and Adam Ward, her cameraman, in Virginia. Shortly after the shooting Williams faxed in a 23-page

Open Document