Racial Profiling

1215 Words3 Pages

The Distrust against Law Enforcements
In today’s society, everything is social media driven. With social media, communication around the world has never been easier. However, the media can often result in negative images, that can even lead to serious and permanent consequences. It also is very manipulative in how easily it can affect how people feel towards a certain topic. The mainstream media acknowledges racial profiling, done by police officers, more than ever. Racial profiling is a sensitive topic and it affects some more than others, such as minorities like African Americans. Many African Americans feel targeted by law enforcements because of the inequality they receive in communities. They feel uncomfortable around police officers …show more content…

Some, especially males, feel like they cannot walk down the street without getting stopped or possibly not return home. In an image, there is two men, one is white while the other one is black (Winters). The image is symmetrical, however, the only difference is that a police car only appears in the rearview mirror of the African American. The phrase ‘driving while black’, refers to the racial profiling among African Americans drivers. That phrase is presented heavily in this image. Both men in the image are gripping the steering wheel (Winters). This make them both appear to be guilty, yet the police officer is only after the African American. It is inferred that because the man is black, the police officers suspect that he has committed an offense. This creates a distrust with our law enforcements which will eventually lead to a distrust in the government …show more content…

In the court case, City of Los Angeles v. Lyons, a black man was pulled over by Los Angeles police department for driving with a burned out tail light. The police officer then proceeds to put the man in a chokehold (Eichelberger). Pulling someone over with a burned out tail light is completely apart of protocol, but immediately putting them in a chokehold afterwards is unnecessary. It brings up questions as to whether or not police officers were trained this way. The ruling of this case was that they had to prove that every person stopped by the Los Angeles police department, was put in a chokehold (Eichelberger). People wondered, was one person not enough? If they did it to one person then they have to have done it before to someone else. It seems like these cases are protecting policeman from their own unjustly

Open Document