TQM: Improving Service Quality

902 Words2 Pages

There are many theories can be used to reduce all these gaps and improve service quality. Starting from Total Quality Management (TQM) and as define by Kelemen (1995), “TQM is a philosophy and practice of management which aims to satisfy the customers by means of employee involvement, consistent leadership and continuous improvement. In so doing, it brings together a number of hard and soft technologies of quality management.” TQM features include good leadership and commitment from top management, staffs participation, customer-driven quality, continuous improvement, rapid response, actions based on facts and a TQM culture.
TQM is a way of how company works which required great deal of commitment and involvement from management in order to …show more content…

The principles of BPR includes to rethink business processes in a more cross-functional manner, position work to be around the flow of information and customers, work towards improvements in performance, tolerate risks, multi-tasking of sources and staffs empowerment. BPR can improve a company in term of profitability, corporate flexibility, measurability, quality and control, customer focus, speed of service delivery and responsiveness (Hammer 2000).However, BPR is not suitable for business that seeks stability such as hospitals because it involves radical rethinking and redesigning processes from zero. By using BPR correctly, all gaps would be significantly reduced and service quality can be improved (Powell …show more content…

The five steps of TOC is identify system constraint which is first to find out the part of a system that has the weakest link. Second, decide how to exploit the constraint which is to switch agent to get as much capability as possible from a constraining component without going through large and expensive changes or upgrades. Third, subordinate everything else which is all the non-constraint components of the system are adjusted to enable the constraint component to operate at maximum effectiveness, whole system would be evaluated to find out if the constraint component has shifted or eliminated, if the constraint has been eliminated, the change agent will jumps to step five. Fourth, elevate the constraint which means eliminate the constraint and major changes can now be considered. Fifth, return to step one, but beware of inertia that would prevent improvement (Moss,

Open Document