Qualitative research is a methodologically approach used to gather an in-depth understanding of human behaviour and reasons for such behaviour. Interviews are commonly used to gather information, from which text, audio and/or visual data is collected. Inorder for these interviews to be successful, the researcher must first establish rapport with the interviewees to ensure easy exchange of information most especially if its personal.
Therefore, how would I establish rapport with the interviewees?
By being more accomodative during the interviews like having social talk before and after the interview. This will show the interviewees that am interested in knowing about their personal lives not just the interview itself. This comes in once the
…show more content…
This would prevent me from coming off as judgemental to particular human behaviour portrayed by the interviewees.
Building rapport and active listening skills are part of the unique skill-sets an interviewer must posses to ensure successful qualitative research. Qualitative research is considered 'messy' because you deal with data you have been provided with using different techniques to make informed conclusions about particular human behaviour. Therefore, one must have a specific set of analytical skills to deal with the diversity of data. Where as in quantitative research, the data collected is more precise due to structured means of data collection.
During interviews, the researcher must have great observation skills especially in regard to the interviewees' body language, because these observations come in handy when transcribing audio and visual data. Unlike in quantitative research, where the observation skills may have less impact when analysing data collected.
In qualitative research, one requires patience with the interviewee when conducting interviews most especially when it comes to answering sensitive questions and durations of the interviews. However in quantitative research, once the researcher builds rapport or conveys the importance of the survey, answering open ended questions is
The purpose of research interviews is to explore the views, beliefs, and motives of individuals on a specific matter for example factors that influence their daily life. They also provide a clear understanding of social issues and an insight that is required from the participant (British dental journal, 2008).The many types of research interview in qualitative research namely are the structured, semi-structured, unstructured and in-depth interview. I will explain them further since they can be used to explore
In-depth interviews are one of the research methods used when qualitative research is desired over quantitative research. Also, by using in-depth interviews as his research method, Messner is able to acquire much more detailed information, which will enhance the quality of his final data, making the study more efficacious and fulfilling. But, as with any research method, in-depth interviews have their strengths and weaknesses. Most importantly, with any research method, optimal levels of representativeness, replicability, reflexivity, reactivity, and objectivity should be
By using interactive strategies which involve direct contact with the person. For me, this is the more effective as it gives you the opportunity to gather many information and to really see if there is interaction between you and the person.
Described below is a critical appraisal of a qualitative article by Lisa Booth using the frame-work suggested by Ryan, Coughlan and Cronin 2007 to establish its believability, robustness, credibility and integrity (Ryan, Coughlan & Cronin, 2007).
SEIDMAN, I., 2012. Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences. Teachers college press.
The interviewer most preferable method was qualitative research. Qualitative research designs are created with the aim of revealing the reasons behind why people behave the way they do, as well as helping understand how they perceive the world around them. “As a research strategy, qualitative research is broadly inductivist, constructionist and interpretivist, but qualitative researchers do not always subscribe to all three of these features’’ (Bryman, 2012, p.380). There are several methodological approaches that can be used to collect qualitative data. These methods include the ethnography/participant observation, conducting interviews, focus group, case studies, conversation analysis and action research.
The questions before today’s researchers are how to apply qualitative research, and when to supplant it with either quantitative research or a mixture of the two.
They differ from questionnaires, as they incorporate social interaction. Interviews are imperative in quality business studies given the fact that accurate and complete information is the basis of any successful venture. Qualitative interviews entail a combination of early preparation and superior interviewer skill sets to ascertain complete sourcing of reliable data.
Qualitative research is defined as the compilation of information based on the intelligence gained from studying human behavior and the underpinnings for such behavior. The qualitative technique explores the reasons (how and why) decisions are made (in addition to the what, where and when.) In this research method, smaller samples are used to predict the behavior of a larger group and which involve an interest and delve into the details of an issue at hand.
5) document interviewee’s primary concerns as being evaluated, pressure to perform, effectively communicating their qualifications and fear of misspeaking. Prior to an interview, interviewees worry about their appearance and their thoughts are primarily negative, already believe they will perform poorly in the interview, despite attempting to avoid the thoughts altogether (Ayres, Keereetaweep, Chen & Edwards (1998, p. 5). Anxiety can cause an interviewee '...to focus attention internally...' (Clark & Wells, cited in Feiler & Powell 2016b, p. 135) resulting in negative and unsubstantiated perceptions of their performance. Clark and Wells (cited in Feiler & Powell 2016b, p. 135) expand on this further, explaining that this internal focus leads interviewees to shift into the '...observer perspective...', which Feiler and Powell (2016b, p. 135) illustrate in an employment interview context as an interviewee perceiving themselves from the interviewers, the observers, perspective, resulting in focus on their anxious responses, resulting in '...more negative self-thoughts.'
Interview is one of the common methods of collecting data and information in social science research. Interviews are probably the approach most used to collect data in studies (Doody & Noonan 2013, p.28) and an attractive proposition for project researchers (Denscombe 2007, p.173). In the research interview, both qualitative and quantitative questions can be asked while doing interview which is mainly based on the purpose, nature and area of research. In research interview quantitative questions generally are closed ended and qualitative questions are open-ended (Doody & Noonan 2013, p. 1).
A qualitative interview is one of the many research methods that sociologists can use to find out certain information. There are two main types of qualitative interviews; semi structured and unstructured. Both of these interview types are flexible meaning that different questions can be asked and questions can be asked in different orders. There are many key factors that show the difference between a qualitative interview and an ordinary conversation. The first key factor is that qualitative interviews have set questions and agendas whereas ordinary conversations are open for any discussion and questions meaning any topics can arise.
Interviews are considered a key method for collecting rich data through interaction with individuals in human and social research, especially in qualitative field (Bernard, 2011; Brinkmann, 2014; Brinkmann & Kvale, 2015; Seidman, 2012; Weiss, 1995). According to Patton (2015) “interviews are open-ended questions and probes yield in-depth response about people’s experiences, perceptions, opinions, feelings, and knowledge” (p 14). In other words, interviews provide insights about participants’ own believes, experiences through social interaction to build more knowledge and understanding about individuals’ behaviors and actions. Brinkmann (2014) identified three kinds of interviews: 1) structured, 2) semi-structured, and 3) unstructured
The research study that was evaluated consisted of the impact that a brief intervention by community health nurses can have on patients who have risk factors for chronic disease, smoking, poor nutrition, alcohol consumption, physical inactivity and weight. Nurses are crucial in primary health care in Australia where the study was conducted. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of lifestyle interventions by the community health nurses.
The interviewer has the advantage of creating a good ambience for the interview to take place. Opdenakker (2006) suggests that, “The interviewer can make more use of a standardisation of the situation.” In my experience, as mentioned earlier, conducive environment where the interview took place at played a major role in synchronous communication. There was no disturbance or no traces of distractions. The interviewee paid complete attention and also seemed interested. Social cues of the interviewee also helped me get some information. Face-to-face interviewing also gave me a chance to observe the voice, intonation and body language of the interviewee which play an important role in delivering messages when answering a question. Coding is essential for qualitative data analysis. It refers to ‘the process of breaking down, examining, comparing, conceptualising and categorising data’ (Strauss and Corbin, 1990, as cited by Bryman, 2015). It can be very time consuming to use coding while analysing interview data because it is very