Puritanism Vs. Rationalism In Colonial America

656 Words2 Pages

The Colonial Period writing in American Literature really showed the values of the time. Whether it was being a Puritan or a Rationalist, many stood forward to share their strong actions, thoughts, and goals. America was just beginning and a great divide stood between Rationalism and Puritanism. Puritans followed God and surrounded their day with work, prayer, and overall restriction of any activity that is for entertainment purposes. The Rationalists questioned human behavior and constantly searched for answers, they listened to their curiosities, but also tried to be their best self. Both sides have their advantages and disadvantages, or goods and bads, but together they stood in strength. People stood strong on their side of the Puritan/Rationalist scale. Anne Bradstreet reflected her Puritan beliefs in “Burning of our House,” which accounted on her house burning to the ground and the emotions it gave her. As she watched everything burn, she stated, “Yet by His gift is made thine own; There‘s wealth enough, I need no more, Farewell, my pelf, farewell, my store. The world no longer let me love, …show more content…

Another time that Puritanism is shown is in Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God by Jonathan Edwards. Edwards explains what happens in Gods hands, he give a strong image to God’s power over everyone. The slightest error or bad action can send you falling into the fire filled pit/hell. Edwards describes, “The God that holds you over the pit of hell, much as one holds a spider, or some loathsome insect, over the fire, abhors you, and is dreadfully provoked” This strong fear of God, and fear instilled actions and beliefs, was very prevalent among

Open Document