Pros And Cons: The Removal Of Native Americans

559 Words2 Pages

Native American Removal

The removal of Native Americans started when Andrew Jackson was elected President. Jackson was the candidate of a Democratic Party, which was good because he was elected at a time when national politics were becoming more democratic. Historians now refer to this trend as the Jacksonian democracy. Jacksonian democracy inforced serious limitations on Native Americans, who were not considered citizens, and women could not vote in any state. This was only the beginning of Native Americans being treated poorly.

Southerners appealed to Jackson because they expected him to help remove the Indians living in the region. Even after the victory in the Creek War of 1814, many Native Americans remained in the South. Americans viewed the land Indians lived on as a way to produce wealth, and wanted to take the land for themselves. When Georgia, Mississippi, and Alabama tried to seize the land held by Native Americans, the Indians …show more content…

They are still trying to cope with adjustment to white civilization. Some are educated and understand white society, while others still live in isolation from all non-Indians.

Today there is about 300 Indian reservations, all still occupied by Indian tribes. Some reservations have greatly increased their economic wealth with the use of casinos. Gambling is a big part of many traditional Indian cultures. The traditional games included dice, archery competitions, and foot races. The use of gaming to generate profit did not begin until the late 1970s and early 1980s when the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act was passed. Before this act, there was no federal gaming structure. The impact that westward expansion had on Native Americans was huge, and made a lasting impact on the lives of many. Even to this day the effects are very noticeable, as casinos are just as popular as

Open Document