Pros And Cons Of Universal Healthcare

1137 Words3 Pages

The United States healthcare system should not be universal because the government should not decide the healthcare choices of it’s citizens. Citizens should be allowed to choose the doctor and coverage they want at the price they are willing to pay. Universal healthcare would not only degrade the medical industry, but it will force people to pay for something they don’t necessarily need, or want. The current healthcare system is a perfect example of government intervention of a free market. Such a system violates the rights of patients, doctors, and businessmen.
Although many people refuse to see it, the foundation of universal healthcare is built upon socialistic ideas. In an industry where talent and intellect is required, value will no longer be placed on the expertise or skill of a doctor. There will be no profit incentive for medical providers if they are compensated the same regardless of the quality of treatment they administer. The two government-run health insurance programs, Medicare and Medicaid, are a perfect example of this. Medicare determines which doctor the patient sees, and what treatments are appropriate. It also determines the duration of the treatment, and compensation of the doctor. Financially speaking, these programs are bankrupting our government. According to the Objective Standard, “These two federal insurance programs compose nearly 20 percent of the federal budget, and the percentage keeps rising.” (Zinser, “Moral Healthcare vs. Universal Healthcare”). Doctors are paid far less from treating Medicare patients because of the insufficient funding of the program, and therefore have to turn away a lot of new Medicare patients. This is an example of what public healthcare will look like if this was prov...

... middle of paper ...

...ally based on cost-effective measures. Treatment for a patient’s health should not be decided by the government.
Privatizing healthcare will impact those who can afford full coverage, and those who can only afford minimal coverage. It will also affect small businesses who won’t be forced to provide healthcare to their employees, a huge expense that would save money, and allow for the hiring of new staff. Overall, better treatment will be provided if the government is removed from the equation. By allowing healthcare businesses to compete with each other, limits will be pushed to accommodate patients. Providers will work to find new cures and new methods of treatment, in order to draw more customers to them. The private healthcare system will compensate doctors and medical professionals for their skill and abilities, and the better they treat their patients, the

Open Document