Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Why should human reproductive cloning not be allowed
Benefits of therapeutic cloning thesis
Is human cloning beneficial
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Why should human reproductive cloning not be allowed
Cloning and further scientific research into cloning should continue because it can lead to amazing advancements in the field of science. The word cloning has a negative connotation due to the media of today giving negative emotional reactions based off inaccurate science fiction. As humans, it is natural to fear the unknown and unusual, but when we let this fear control us we are deprived of the infinite possibilities to the betterment of humanity.
Due to such negative reactions towards cloning the public is never given the opportunity to actually go into depth about what exactly cloning does. There are two types of cloning, one of the two, “reproductive cloning is when the creation of an individual has identical genetic material to an existing being” (Bargalow). In comparison, therapeutic cloning is the removal of genetic material to clone and mend a patient's cells, organs, or
…show more content…
"Therapeutic Cloning Can Save Lives." The Ethics of Human Cloning, edited by John Woodward, Greenhaven Press, 2005. At Issue. Opposing Viewpoints In Context, http://link.galegroup.com.catalog.stisd.net:2048/apps/doc/EJ3010028219/OVIC?u=j031916004&sid=OVIC&xid=79594319. Accessed 11 May 2018.
Binswanger, Harry. "Human Cloning Is Not Unethical." Genetic Engineering, edited by David M. Haugen and Susan Musser, Greenhaven Press, 2009. Opposing Viewpoints. Opposing Viewpoints In Context, http://link.galegroup.com.catalog.stisd.net:2048/apps/doc/EJ3010138273/OVIC?u=j031916004&sid=OVIC&xid=d0e73c7f. Accessed 11 May 2018. Originally published as "Immoral to Ban Human Cloning: Irrational Fears Must Not Block Scientific Advances," Capitalism Magazine, 19 Dec. 2003.
DeHainaut, Raymond K. "Human Cloning Is Not Inherently Unethical." The Ethics of Human Cloning, edited by William Dudley, Greenhaven Press, 2001. At Issue. Opposing Viewpoints In Context, http://link.galegroup.com.catalog.stisd.net:2048/apps/doc/EJ3010028207/OVIC?u=j031916004&sid=OVIC&xid=999bd59d. Accessed 11 May
Therapeutic cloning is the process whereby parts of a human body are grown independently from a body from STEM cells collected from embryos for the purpose of using these parts to replace dysfunctional ones in living humans. Therapeutic Cloning is an important contemporary issue as the technology required to conduct Therapeutic Cloning is coming, with cloning having been successfully conducted on Dolly the sheep. This process is controversial as in the process of collecting STEM cells from an embryo, the embryo will be killed. Many groups, institutions and religions see this as completely unacceptable, as they see the embryo as a human life. Whereas other groups believe that this is acceptable as they do not believe that the embryo is a human life, as well as the fact that this process will greatly benefit a large number of people. In this essay I will compare the view of Christianity who are against Therapeutic Cloning with Utilitarianism who are in favour of Therapeutic Cloning.
Understanding the facts as well as procedures between the many different types of cloning is very crucial. When everything boils down there are three types of cloning known as DNA cloning, therapeutic cloning and reproductive cloning. DNA cloning is the copying of a gene in order to transfer it into another organism which is usually used by farmers in most of their crops. Therapeutic cloning is the use of stem cells used to help take the place of whatever cell is missing which is potentially used to help the ill. Stem cells contain the potential to grow and help replace the genes that are missing in order to fix whatever is genetically wrong with your body or any genes that you may be missing. Reproductive cloning actually produces a living animal from only one parent. The endless possibilities and perhaps hidden motives of using genetic engineering are what divide as well as destroy the scientific community’s hope for passing laws that are towards pro cloning. Many people within soci...
Brown, Alistair. "Therapeutic Cloning: The Ethical Road To Regulation Part I: Arguments For And Against & Regulations." Human Reproduction & Genetic Ethics 15.2 (2009): 75-86. Academic Search Complete. Web. 24 Mar. 2014.
“Cloning represents a very clear, powerful, and immediate example in which we are in danger of turning procreation into manufacture.” (Kass) The concept of cloning continues to evoke debate, raising extensive ethical and moral controversy. As humans delve into the fields of science and technology, cloning, although once considered infeasible, could now become a reality. Although many see this advancement as the perfect solution to our modern dilemmas, from offering a potential cure for cancer, AIDS, and other irremediable diseases, its effects are easily forgotten. Cloning, especially when concerning humans, is not the direction we must pursue in enhancing our lives. It is impossible for us to predict its effects, it exhausts monetary funds, and it harshly abases humanity.
First and foremost, it is important to discuss what human cloning is. It is the conception of in vitro embryos that produces “individuals that are exact genetic copies of the donor from whom the DNA was obtained” (Munson 366). In Laymen’s terms, cells are inserted from the donor host into an unfertilized egg from another host (meaning it is asexual) and the new egg is transferred into the surrogate mother where it will foster into an embryo, if effective.
Postrel, Virginia. “Should Human Cloning Be Allowed? Yes, Don’t Impede Medical Progress.” In Dynamic Argument. Ed. Robert Lamm and Justin Everett. New York: Houghton Mifflin, 2007. 420-23.
8. Pellegrino, Edmund D., “Human Cloning and Human Dignity.” The President’s Council on Bioethics. 22 July 2007
For generations, the concept of human cloning has been cloaked by a theme of ethical atrocities. For example, in the novel Never Let Me Go, the author, Kazuo Ishiguro, explores the application of human cloning for medical purposes. Within this dystopian setting, human cloning has eradicated most lethal diseases and has extended the human life expectancy well beyond one hundred years. But, the problem lies within how these successes are achieved. The protagonists are clones of specific people and serve the purpose of donating organs when the original person needs them. This creates an ethical dilemma in which the value of human life is compromised. However, this is an exaggerated scenario of one form of human cloning and fails to properly represent the concept. Human cloning is the process of creating an offspring from the DNA of a patient. The DNA is inserted into an unfertilized egg of a woman creating an
In the article that I chose there are two opposing viewpoints on the issue of “Should Human Cloning Ever Be Permitted?” John A. Robertson is an attorney who argues that there are many potential benefits of cloning and that a ban on privately funded cloning research is unjustified and that this type of research should only be regulated. On the flip side of this issue Attorney and medical ethicist George J. Annas argues that cloning devalues people by depriving them of their uniqueness and that a ban should be implemented upon it. Both express valid points and I will critique the articles to better understand their points.
If we, the people of the united states of America, and others decide to work together on this situation and work out the differences, scientists are almost one hundred percent positive that cloning can be a push towards the future. There has been a lot of discussion between the benefits and negatives about cloning. As the year’s progress, and the technology advances, there aren’t many flaws in the idea. People may think that cloning is a bad thing, because it hurts animals, or it hurts the cells of humans, but it’s rather positive, because of the things we learn from it. The positives are far greater than the negatives, and people will soon enough come to realize that to progress in the scientific study scientists will soon realize how what the next step in the process is.
While many people envision the future being a utopia of automation and technological advances other individuals such as Aldous Huxley see a much darker, dystopian environment. The concepts of a utopia and dystopia are often confused. A utopia consists of perfection while a dystopia is often described as unpleasant. Dystopian ideas are often pleasant in concept however in practice these ideas may become disastrous. Many predictions have been made about society’s distant dystopian future, however many chilling examples have came true.
"Human Cloning and Human Dignity: An Ethical Inquiry." The President's Council on Bioethics Washington, D.C. N.p., July-Aug. 2002. Web.
Recent discoveries involving cloning have sparked ideas of cloning an entire human body (ProQuest Staff). Cloning is “the production of an organism with genetic material identical to that of another organism” (Seidel). Therapeutic cloning is used to repair the body when something isn’t working right, and it involves the production of new cells from a somatic cell (Aldridge). Reproductive cloning involves letting a created embryo develop without interference (Aldridge). Stem cells, if isolated, will continue to divide infinitely (Belval 6). Thoughts of cloning date back to the beginning of the twentieth century (ProQuest Staff). In 1938, a man decided that something more complex than a salamander should be cloned (ProQuest Staff). A sheep named Dolly was cloned from an udder cell in 1997, and this proved that human cloning may be possible (Aldridge). In 1998, two separate organizations decl...
Modern technology is used in everyday life. We rely on it all day, everyday. We also rely on technology to solve our problems or enhance our customs of life. Few people do not take into account the momentary condition of genetic cloning. Genetic Cloning is the process of replicating or copying genes of any organism. With that, there are three classifications of Cloning: DNA Technology (gene cloning), reproductive cloning, and Therapeutic Cloning (the virtual removal of nucleus). These operations would have been an unbelievable and impossible phenomenal in the last centuries. It may have included religious judgment, such as the idea of man working with the devil. However, when films were developed relating to scientific outbreaks in 1900s,
Robinson, Bruce. “Human Cloning: Comments by political groups, religious authorities, and individuals.” 3 August 2001. Ontario Consultants on Religious Tolerance. 1 October 2001 <http://www.religioustolerance.org/clo_reac.htm>.