Pros And Cons Of The Continental Congress

1043 Words3 Pages

The Continental Congress will soon discuss the notion of the 13 colonies separating from Great Britain. Likewise, the people of the colonies have debated independence, and most wish for the United Colonies of America to remain colonies of Britain. There are solid arguments from proponents of both stances, but the majority want to continue the union between the Colonies and Britain. Many do not see the corruption of the government of Britain. They still believe the King of Britain can do no wrong. For the good of the common people, the truth about the goings-on should be open to all and the opinions of those for independence should be heard. To assess the flaws of the British government, we should start with how they run their government: by monarchy. A monarchy passes the power and responsibility of running a kingdom down by blood relatives. This can give power to those who are hated, unfit to rule, or plain incompetent for such a role. The tradition dates back to centuries where people thought their monarchs were godlike. However, the current King of Britain seems less like a divine god and more like a creature that crawled from the …show more content…

He decided the recent event—where around 340 chests of tea were thrown into the Boston Harbour—was planned by the whole of Boston itself. In reality, the Sons of Liberty planned it. They are a group of proponents for the independence of the colonies, and they do not represent the stance of the entire city of Boston. They did this because they are against the Tea Act. The Tea Act is a law that was proposed and authorised by the British Parliament and allowed the East India Company to have a monopoly over selling tea throughout the colonies, preventing local tea merchants from making a profit. The Sons of Liberty decided the best way to defy Britain was to throw the tea overboard, throwing away the money spent by the British to gather the tea and send it to the

Open Document