Following your request, I have reviewed our current performance appraisal system, and I would like to share the results. Three main points that I would like to highlight concerning our performance appraisal system are the pros and cons of the system, several recommendations to improve the system, and a thought of making it less subjective. Performance appraisal in most organizations is perceived as a critical human resource management function. It is believed that a well-designed and implemented performance appraisal system can offer the employee, the supervisor, and the organization several benefits, such as providing supervisors a useful communication instrument for the employee goal setting and performance planning, increasing employee …show more content…
In addition, participant acceptance of the performance appraisal system is perceived to be a crucial element in appraisal effectiveness. Supervisors and subordinates must also have a joint view on the performance appraisal purpose and believe that it is beneficial to them on the individual basis. Pros of our current performance appraisal system Performance appraisal system serves as a tool to assess employees’ performance and helps to plan and measure the organization’s goals accomplishment. Luthy (1998) suggested that “individual contributions must be based on clear direction, personal planning, individual and team assignments, and well-articulated knowledge, skills, and personal attributes”, to give employees expectations to meet and information that establish the organization performance standard. Performance appraisals give management the important information for making strategic decisions about employee advancement, retention, and separation. It also connects training and development with career planning and long-term human resources needs of the organization’s (Pynes, 2004). Fortunately, our performance appraisal system has been considered and applied these factors. Cons of our current performance appraisal …show more content…
Hence, the employees may not be aware of the performance standards employed to evaluate them (Condrey, 2005). Supervisors are expected to assess employees and give feedback without first getting training, which make them ill-prepare to coach and advise their subordinates (Pynes, 2004). Since our supervisors have not provided with a relevant training regarding performance appraisal and giving feedback, they do not have enough knowledge, skill, and ability to coach and advise their subordinates, which is consistent with Pynes’ concern. When performance appraisal is employed in the context of strategic human resources management (SHRM), it should provide feedback to employees, facilitate individual decisions, give information crucial for planning and research (Pynes, 2004). Feedback is crucial for the performance improvement (Condrey, 2005). Our performance appraisal feedback has not yet been monitored and reported regularly to ensure that improvement suggestions have been done. In addition, supervisors have not yet done a regular feedback about employees’ performance, to give them an opportunity to take immediate correctional
Miller, C. E., & Thornton, C. L. (2006). How Accurate Are Your Performance Appraisals? Public Personnel Management, 35(2), 153-162.
Introduction What does it mean to be an effective supervisor? Before taking this class, I thought that if a supervisor is able get their employees to work effectively, and efficiently, then the person is an effective supervisor. I didn’t realize until taking this class that supervisors do so much more. After learning more about the other tasks supervisors do like planning, being effective listeners, and motivating employees, I have a better understanding of effective supervision. I am aware that I have had supervisory experiences.
DiClemente (2013) stated, “Although no evaluation is perfect, evaluation research can have a high degree of rigor” (DiClemente, Salazar, & Crosby, 2013, pp. 298). The result of a high degree of rigor can lead to the utilization by program planners and policy experts which would in turn could impact public health policy and promotion practice (DiClemente et al., 2013). This is obtained by a step by step, all equally important, process in what is known as the “Nine Step Stairway to Effective Evaluation”.
The performance assessment and appraisal forms are crucial within the performance management system (Aguinis, 2014). However, the appraisal form within the case study provided is designed for the supervisor’s use thus missing one vital factor throughout the entire process, employee participation. Thus, questioning the validity and reliability of the process. This is especially concerning as the bottom 10 per cent of employees are being fired and the top 20 per cent are being rewarded with $5,000.00 based on what their supervisor records on the form without consultation with employees. Thus, supervisors may not provide accurate scores as they do not have to justify their responses (Aguinis,
Based on your view of the objectives of performance evaluation, evaluate the perspectives about performance appraisal presented by the managers.
There is an array of key components and factors involved in making an organization a successful business. One of those elements consists on evaluating employee’s performance; this sole component is critical in determining how effective is the organization’s productivity and which are the necessary steps to ensure proper functioning. “The performance appraisal may be one of the few times during the year where an employee and the reviewer, typically the employee's supervisor, can sit down and have a lengthy face-to-face discussion about all aspects of the job” (Joseph, 2016). Employees’ performance assessment serves as an instrument to gather important information as to which areas of the job description are being performed according to standards
The foundation for effective job performance and compensation system can be traced to effective job analysis process. Fundamentally, a job analysis should consist of a thorough examination of the job 's duties and knowledge, skills, abilities, and qualities that are required in order to be successful in a specific position, upon which appropriate rewards or compensation can be determined. For many perspectives, jobs are usually made up of requirements and rewards, where rewards may be regarded as a major recruitment strategy for motivating potential employees in order to influence them to stay the organization for a longer period as well as enhance their performance. The most common or basic form of rewards which attracts employees is extrinsic
The author and his supporters have an incredibly resource full website that provides more information, over 1000 relevant articles, tools, assessments and more. You can dig in at www.performance-appraisals.org. No information, registration or costs required for this site.
Performance appraisal is perceived by most as a tool to reward or penalize employees for their good or bad work respectively by the end of a year. This notion is a challenge in itself to deal with. The whole exercise becomes dull for both supervisors and their subordinates and they tend to look at it as an additional responsibility which they have to finish. In the end, there is little or no value addition for either the employee or the organization. There are, however, better ways of looking at and conducting performance appraisals. It can give much needed feedback to both performers and laggards to improve upon and if done properly can even boost their motivation. More importantly, they provide a chance to employees to have a say in their goal setting and thus aligning it with the departmental and organizational goals. Also, the process itself has a value in team making.
In this paper I critically reflect on five different self-assessments: locus of control (LOC), emotional intelligence (EI), listening self-inventory, team member type and conflict management. Throughout my discussion, I focus on their correlations and apply the gathered information to my work-life experiences. I will also provide a systematic assessment of each of these questionnaires. This evaluation will address any possible weaknesses I had found within the tests and prepare my final conclusions based upon those final educated results.
The manager communicates with the members of staff individually on a regular basis providing all the necessary information about the employee’s overall performance as it relates to their roles in the workplace. This performance appraisal is beneficial to employees as it allows them to create an outline for their goals with the greatest effort it should not be used to lower the employee’s level of motivation but seek to increase it.
Authentic assessment, though sometimes referred to as performance-based assessment is not a new idea, in fact its history dates back to the 1950’s. With more than half a century of debate on the subject in varying branches of thought, this paper will focus on a few of the key concepts of authentic assessment as seen through the lens of an artist. An investigation of the literature begins with a brief look at the historical concept of mastery as was practiced through the ancient system of patronage, workshops, and guilds. The discussion that follows will examine the theoretical thought on authentic assessment and the implications for practice.
Grubb, T. (2007). "Performance Appraisal Reappraised: It's Not All Positive." Journal of Human Resource Education. Vol. 1, (No. 1,): 1-22.
There are several reasons organizations initiate performance evaluations, however the standard purpose for performance evaluations is to discuss performance expectations; not only from the employers perspective but to engage in a formal collaboration where the employee and the manager are both able to provide feedback in a formal discourse. There are many different processes an organization should follow when developing its performance evaluation tool; in addition essential characteristics that must accompany an effective performance appraisal process. I will discuss in detail the intent of a performance evaluation, the process an organization should follow in using its performance evaluation tool, along with the characteristics of an effective
Banner, D. K., Graber, J. M. (1985). Critical issues in performances appraisal. Journal of Management Development. Issue 4. Pp. 27-35.