Pros And Cons Of Non Human Animals

750 Words2 Pages

In the United States, non-human animals ought to have legally protected rights:
An argument essay paper
Payton Sawyers, 15-months old, suffered life-threatening injuries after she was attacked by a pitbull-mix while under the care of her babysitters on January 6, . Grayson County Sheriff’s Deputies and Rescue Personnel responded to a 911 call about 9:30 pm. The child was airlifted to Brenner Children’s Hospital in Winston-Salem, North Carolina in critical condition. Sheriff Richard Vaughan said the child was attacked by the couple’s pit bull-mix, and the dog had the child’s head in its mouth. After an investigation, including executing a search warrant of the couple’s home, John Underwood II and Terra Connell were charged with felony child …show more content…

According to Collins English Dictionary, non-human means not human or not produced by humans. You may ask why we have rights as human beings, but there are natural differences that separate us from animals. The first reason that humans are different is that they have the ability to know right from wrong, this allows individuals to make decisions by evaluating the possible result of an action. It allows individuals to establish rules between them, so they can peacefully coexist. These norms are the right to life, liberty, and property — all ensure social harmony(Citation). In the animal world, the situation is very different. These creatures are guided by their instincts, and their interaction with other species as a result of Darwinian natural evolution. In the wild only the strongest survive. Despite humans, in places where animals interact, there is no other law than the survival of the fittest. Human beings who deliberately cause animals to suffer are inhumane. They should be socially punished, as they are now. However, this is not reason enough to turn animals into subjects of law. Do you really think that an animal has the right to vote for President? If we were to give animals rights, it would include all animals and those spiders that tend to get in your house come winter would have the right to live, and you would not be able to get rid of them without going to jail for …show more content…

In them, there is a clear distinction made between entities that can sue and entities that cannot sue. The entities that belong to the first category are legal persons. Those that belong to the second category are objects. Significant legal protection can only be granted to entities having legal rights, and rights can only really be held by legal people. The law does offer some protection to animals, but if they cannot meet the expectations of the law they are considered things. Example: We may not be legally allowed to destroy an important artwork even if it is our property. However, this does not doesn’t mean that the work of art has rights. It doesn’t, because it’s not a legal person. If you want to try to change the law, so that nonhumans can have a right; it would require an entire new legal

Open Document