Pros And Cons Of Indeterminate Sentencing

1046 Words3 Pages

Determinate sentencing encompasses sentencing guidelines, mandatory minimum sentence, and enhanced sentences for certain crimes. The judge will take in consideration of the person charged and the details of the crime when he determines the sentence. The system has a mandatory minimum and enhanced statute that prevents the judge on his/her discretion for the terms of a sentencing of the person. These determinate sentencing statutes were put in place since 1980 to deter crime. The laws in most states dictated what crimes received what determinate sentence. The product of the determinate sentencing was form the war on drugs. These laws where to deter drugs by being harsh and hard on people who where committing the drug crimes. Then in 1990 the "three strikes-and-you're-out" law was used for anyone who was convicted of a third felony. The law had a term of 25 years to life for anyone convicted of a third felony crime. Determinate sentencing eliminates parole boards and credit for participation in rehabilitation …show more content…

Everyone in the system has a different issue so the rehabilitation is set for each person’s needs and requirement to correct that issue for reintegration back into society. The reintegration into society depends on the actions of that person serving the indeterminate sentencing. When the parole board reviews the record the actions that person knows that an early release is based on that review. The prison system will use the process in the rehabilitation process to enforce good behavior while serving time. The entire person will know that everything in the process will be reviewed. The crime and how violent it was to the victim, everything counts, the criminal history and the prison record. The rehabilitation process to show that the person will and can be a reintegration into society without any further criminal behavior. (National Assessment of Structured Sentencing.

Open Document