Pros And Cons Of Heaven And Hell

1885 Words4 Pages

The uncertainty of what lies ahead after we die has captured the human psych for ages and many forms of beliefs have been implemented throughout time and religions. Starting with the ancient religions in Mesopotamia, modern day Iraq, where there exists seven different levels of heaven and hell where individuals who died would be able to have a fair judgement of whether or not they deserved to be in a place of wondrous pleasures or torturous torment. Each level of heaven or hell designates the level of pleasure or torment an individual will encounter. This can also be said in most of the other major religions in the world, whether ancient, modern or future ones. The ancient Greek religion had different levels of heaven and hell with the exception …show more content…

There should not be a way for individuals to be tortured in many endless and continuous scatological depictions of hell. If it is immoral and sub-ethical in the living world to perform such heinous acts upon an individual, the idea of hell should be scant. This is not to say that there shouldn’t be any form of punishment for individuals who committed horrible crimes, quite the contrary, however, no matter how outrageous the crime might be, it does not justify an eternity or a temporary burning, being dipped in boiling oil, mauled, and many more form in hell. For those individuals who see these torturous descriptions of hell as metaphorical, it should also be sub-ethical since one, no one should wish badness upon someone else, and two, there are many recorded evidence of actual living human beings being tortured like the descriptions provided of hell. If these individuals now see those acts as horrifying and shameful to human history, then so should the idea that in hell this is what will happen to an individual. Also, it is just more comforting knowing that no matter what you might end up in hell and be punished in some lean way than to know you will be mauled and butchered in

Open Document