Pros And Cons Of Edward Snowden

1647 Words4 Pages

Edward Snowden, a former Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) employee and National Security Agency (NSA) contractor, shocked the world in June 2013 after becoming the source of one of the largest information leaks in U.S. history. Snowden, who copied at least 1.7 million documents from the agency and shared up to 200,000 of them with reporters, revealed to the world operational details about the NSA and its surveillance programs of US citizens and targets abroad (Toxen). In order to escape punishment in America, Snowden fled to Hong Kong, and eventually to Moscow, Russia where he currently resides. Ever since this classified information was leaked, there has been growing controversy over the legality and ethicality of these programs, and questions …show more content…

This act authorized the creation of a secret court to regulate and review government requests for FISA orders, called the FISA court (or FISC). With the invention of new technologies like the Internet and growing threats of domestic and international terrorism, the FISC system has undergone reforms to make the process of obtaining these surveillance warrants easier. Laws passed after the September 11th attacks made it easier for the government to request access to this electronic information, harder for telecommunications companies to refuse, “and nearly impossible for them to voice their concerns publicly.” (Mears, Abdullah) And, after revisions made to these laws in 2008, officials now have greater authority to order "mass acquisition" of information, so long as it is relevant to a terror investigation (Mears, Abdullah). These recent events reflect an obvious transition in the NSA surveillance targets from foreign terrorism to domestic activity. Since the establishment of the FISC in 1978, it has denied only eleven out of approximately 35,000 government requests …show more content…

Smith to validate the government’s current bulk and arbitrary collection of telephony metadata (Mornin 997). According to a heavily reacted FISC amended memorandum opinion “The production of telephone service provider metadata is squarely controlled by the U.S. Supreme Court decision in Smith v. Maryland … the same type of information is at issue here” (Eagan). Because phone companies are already collecting this metadata for a variety of business purposes, consumers don’t have a reasonable expectation of privacy and have therefore voided their fourth amendment rights (Mornin 997). “Callers assume the risk that companies will disclose this information to the government.” (Mornin

Open Document