Pros And Cons Of Cohabitation

954 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Benefits of cohabitation

Cohabitation is an increasing trend which has become the norm for 70 percent of today's unmarried couples. Cohabitation is defined as "two unrelated adults of the opposite sex living in the same residence" ( Kunz p.154). Couples who "live together" no longer carries the stigma that it did 50 years ago, Why do people feel that cohabitating is a prelude for marriage or not? What has throughout all times been special about women is their natural tendency to bond, nurture, show compassion
Today many couples (those who are engaged and those who are not) prepare for their possible married life together by cohabiting, or "living together," before marriage. There are countless reasons why couples cohabitate and are varied. In spite of this, most viewpoints is commonly held that couples who live together before marriage can more adequately determine if their lifetime commitment to one another as husband and wife is promising. Generations ago, our society viewed cohabitating as a couple before marriage was scandalous which young people were strongly discouraged from cohabiting. As a society, that view has been greatly challenged today. Research shown between 30 percent and 40 percent of couples seeking marriage in the United States today are cohabitating. Most of our society believes cohabiting not only as permissible, but even as necessary to attempt to diminish the possibility of divorce or marital unhappiness later in the life of the couple.
Living together is a steadily growing trend that is now the norm in today's society. Research shows that one out of four women will live with a man by age 20 and three out of four women will live with a man by age 30. As far as divorce rates go, couples who live together but are committed i...

... middle of paper ...

...and working together to accomplish this life goal is critical. Let me be clear, when it comes to living together prior to marriage you are opening a door to even more temptation. the bible tells us to flee from the appearance of evil and immorality, not exposing ourselves to constant temptation( KJV Ephesians 5:3) as previously stated, generations ago, marriage was based on morals, and values but as society continues to evolve that practice is no longer seen as the norm. It is not honoring God when man and woman live together outside of marriage.
If people who cohabit takes the representation of marriage at the same time as married couples refuse them, these symbols can no longer be taken as a reliable guide to a person's "real" or legal marital status. It, therefore, becomes increasingly difficult to tell which heterosexual couples are married and which are not.

Show More
Related

  • Cohabitation In Canada Case Study

    1502 Words  | 4 Pages

    This correlates with data found in Steuber and Paik (2014) article regarding cohabitation. The researchers found that majority of cohabitating relationships are formed in early adulthood (Steuber & Paik 2014). The responses from the five couples also show that cohabitating can be a short-lived union (ibid). Couple D moved the quickest and married within a year of cohabitating together (Personal experience D 2014). Couple E separated after three years of cohabitation (Personal E 2014). These two experiences show that cohabitation can be short-lived relationships that end within three years (Steuber & Paik 2014).Of the duration of my research, Couple A, B, and C remain in cohabitating relationships, it will be interesting to see how these three cohabitating relationships will end. Couple A, B, C, D and E list some type of financial constraint as a reason for cohabitating. Couple A are in entry level position jobs and living in Toronto (Personal experience A 2014). This couple expressed that it is cheaper to share expenses especially rent (ibid). Couple B decided to cohabitate together because it is financially more stable to share expenses (Personal experience B 2014). The female in this relationship is finishing her postgraduate education and the male works full time (ibid). Couple D also had financial constraints because of the expensive rent in Toronto, and the male is still completing his education (Personal experience D 2014). Couple E had financial constraints because they were employed in low income jobs (Personal experience E 2014). They both only have high school education (ibid). The personal experiences experienced by these four couples show the financial insecurity of this age group. This correlates well with data found in the Statistics Canada (2012) financial security survey, the median net worth of individuals under the age of 35

    Read More

  • Cohabitation and its Effect on Marital Stability in the US

    1723 Words  | 4 Pages

    Cohabitation, over the last two decades has gone from being a relatively uncommon social phenomenon to a commonplace one and has achieved this prominence quite quickly. A few sets of numbers convey both the change and its rapidity. The percentage of marriages preceded by cohabitation rose from about 10% for those marrying between 1965 and 1974 to over 50% for those marrying between 1990 and 1994 (Bumpass and Lu 1999, Bumpass & Sweet 1989); the percentage is even higher for remarriages. Secondly, the percentage of women in their late 30s who report having cohabited at least once rose from 30% in 1987 to 48% in 1995. Given a mere eight year tome window, this is a striking increase. Finally, the proportion of all first unions (including both marriages and cohabitation) that begin as cohabitations rose from 46% for unions formed between 1980 and 1984 to almost 60% for those formed between 1990 and 1994 (Bumpass and Lu 1999).

    Read More

  • Marriage Culture in the United States

    1252 Words  | 3 Pages

    This societal acceptance has made it easier for couples to live together without being married. Many of these men and women decide to live together because they consider the cohabitation a "trial marriage." They fe...

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast The Marital Decline And Marital Resilience Perspective

    1055 Words  | 3 Pages

    Marriage is the legal or formally recognized union of a man and a woman, or two people or the same sex as partners in a relationship. Marriage rates in the United States have changed drastically since the last 90’s and early 2000 years (Cherlin 2004). Marital decline perspective and marital resilience perspective are the two primary perspectives and which we believe are the results from the decline. The marital decline perspective is the view that the American culture has become increasingly individualistic and preoccupied with personal happiness (Amato, 2004). The change in attitudes has changed the meaning of marriage as a whole, from a formal institution

    Read More

  • A Lesson Before Dying, by Ernest Gaines

    835 Words  | 2 Pages

    Jayson, Sharon. “Census reports more unmarried couples living together.” USA Today. 28 Jul. 2008. Web. 14 Sept. 2011. .

    Read More

  • Analysis Of Drew Magary's The Postmortal

    1199 Words  | 3 Pages

    In this era we live in, we are brought up to think divorce is bound to happen. According to The American Psychological Association, “about 40 to 50 percent of married couples in the United States divorce” and “the divorce rate for subsequent marriages is even higher.” Many adults decide that it is less messy to just live with one another rather than actually get married. This is beginning to drive the rates of marriage down. Many have speculated that relationships will continue to evolve, especially if the human lifespan continues expand. Fiction writers such as Drew Magary and real world scientists such as Aubrey de Grey have explored this very topic of relationships.

    Read More

  • Critical Response: The Downside Of Living Together

    1023 Words  | 3 Pages

    More Americans are getting divorced at an astonishing rate, according to the McKinley Irvin Family Law, there are about 16,800 divorces per week. This phenomenon has triggered a general panic among young adults. Therefore, animated by their fear of getting divorced, young adults have elaborated a new solution to avoid divorce which is cohabitation. They see cohabitation as a test to avoid divorce. However, does cohabitation really work? Meg Jay in her text entitled “The Downside of Living Together” defends the idea that seeing cohabitation as a preventive way to avoid divorce leads to increase the chance of divorce. I believe that cohabitation

    Read More

  • The Risks of Premarital Cohabitation

    2936 Words  | 6 Pages

    It is not a new thought that today’s young Americans are facing issues, problems and difficult decisions that past generations never had to question. In a world of technology, media, and a rough economy, many young adults in America are influenced by a tidal wave of opinions and life choices without much relevant advice from older generations. The Generation Y, or Millennial, group are coming of age in a confusing and mixed-message society. One of these messages that bombard young Americans is the choice of premarital cohabitation. Premarital cohabitation, or living together without being married (Jose, O’Leary & Moyer, 2010), has increased significantly in the past couple of decades and is now a “natural” life choice before taking the plunge into marriage. Kennedy and Bumpass (2008) state that, “The increase in cohabitation is well documented,such that nearly two thirds of newlyweds have cohabited prior to their first marriage”(as cited in Harvey, 2011, p. 10), this is a striking contrast compared with statistics of our grandparents, or even parents, generations. It is such an increasing social behavior that people in society consider cohabitation “necessary” before entering into marriage. Even more, young Americans who choose not to cohabitate, for many different reasons, are looked upon as being “old-fashioned”, “naive”, or “unintelligent”. This pressure for young people to cohabitate before marriage is a serious “modern-day” challenge; especially when given research that states, “... most empirical studies find that couples who cohabited prior to marriage experience significantly higher odds of marital dissolution than their counterparts who did not cohabit before marriage”, stated by Jose (2010) and colleagues (as c...

    Read More

  • Summary Arlene Skolnick Ground For Marriage

    521 Words  | 2 Pages

    In the article “Grounds for Marriage: How Relationships Succeed or Fail” by Arlene Skolnick talks a lot about how the attitudes towards marriages now a days is much different then what peoples attitudes have been in the past. The article talks about how there are two parts of every marriage “the husband’s and the wife’s”. This article touches on the affects cohabitation, and how cohabitation is more likely to happen among younger adults. This article talks about how the younger adults are more inclined to cohabitate before marriage, and that currently the majority of couples that are interring in to marriage have previously lived together. The article stats that some of the Possible reasons for couples to live together before marriage might include shifting norms

    Read More

  • Cohabitation In A Brave New World Analysis

    2189 Words  | 5 Pages

    Cohabitation is “to live together as if married, usually without legal or religious sanction; to live together in an intimate relationship” (Dictionary.com). In the past thirty years, there have been several changes in trends of American families. Cohabitation of males and females has been happening earlier and more frequently resulting in it being viewed as normal (Waite 19). The median age of first marriage has risen approximately by six years (Morris). Between late 1940s and early 1960s the amount of women who have cohabitated by age twenty-five increased by thirty percent. The increase in cohabitation correlates with a decline in marriage (Waite 20). You might say that couples who were already living together no longer felt the need to get married because they were already living together. **Cohabitation can lead to intimacy, so if a couple is living together before marriage they are likely to be intimate before marriage. At one point in time, cohabitation and intimacy would have been unacceptable before marriage but now they are seen as the norm. In A Brave New World, they mock that at a time, children having sex would have been frowned upon. “…erotic play between children had been regarded as abnormal (there was a roar of laughter); and not only abnormal, actually immoral (no!): and had therefore been rigorously suppressed” (Huxley 34). People are thankfully arrested today for crazy

    Read More

  • Cohabitation Vs. Marital Unions

    390 Words  | 1 Pages

    According to the research most couples inter into cohabitation because it allows them to postpone their entrance into what would be considered traditional gender-specific marital roles in a family environment. This couples may later either evolve into marriage or break up their cohabitation status. Both marriage and cohabitation are considered "romantic coresidential unions," however, researchers have pressed forward a belief that people that enter into cohabitation are a select group of highly liberal individuals. Couples enter cohabitation because it is a tentative association that allows them to accommodate their specific values and beliefs into this romantic coresidential union.

    Read More

  • Cohabitation Before Marriage

    1668 Words  | 4 Pages

    Supporters of cohabitation argue that testing pre-marital compatibility is the best method for a relationship to quit or move forward. People are concerned about whether or not they are marrying the right person, so the option of living toge...

    Read More

  • Trends of Marriage and Divorce

    1291 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Web. 12 Dec. 2013. Shiono, Patricia H., and Linda S. Quinn. " National Trends in Marriage, Divorce, and Remarriage. "

    Read More

  • Persuasive Speech: The Three Reasons Of Cohabitation Before Marriage

    1174 Words  | 3 Pages

    The divorce statistics and couples living together paint an interesting picture. More than half the couples that decided to marry lived together before hand.

    Read More

  • Advantages Of Living Together Before Marriage

    700 Words  | 2 Pages

    They move in together to learn each others way to compromise and to see if living with each other becomes a successful process to a healthy lifestyle. When moving in together there’s a big question of commitment that takes place. I think that when you move in with someone you know your committed to one another, but are you so committed as to getting married with each other? I understand that a person can be scared that living together will be completely different than expected. When this happens a person already has a negative mindset that thing won’t work out and that’s exactly what happens. Negativity has a great impact on our daily lives, because if you don’t believe than you don’t

    Read More

More about Pros And Cons Of Cohabitation

Open Document