Pros And Cons Of Christian Worldview

399 Words1 Page

Bush devotes significant attention to accentuating the inherent problems of advancement philosophy and simultaneously demonstrates the negative implications of adopting such propositions consistently. Concentrating on the field of epistemology, Bush exemplifies the major catastrophes that result from a naturalistic worldview. He contends, If the rational human mind is merely a biological product, which it must be if naturalistic evolution were true, then the mind is not an independent observer, no matter how complex or sophisticated it may be, and it is therefore not truly free to explore or examine reality. The functions of the mind would be produced and controlled solely by the genetic, chemical makeup of and the environmental influences on each individual. Such models preclude human free will and eliminate mankind’s ability to discern objective truths. In fact, advancement thinking challenges the very notion of objective truth, suggesting that propositions are relative to the moment, and truth as an absolute whole is always changing and developing. …show more content…

Bush elucidates these points, commenting, “God himself, is the only viable guarantee of the objectivity of truth,” and “If God created the world, as the Christian Bible said that he did, then the world of nature should be reasonably stable, orderly, and predictable. God was not capricious or haphazard in his work of creation or preservation.” Moreover, the Christian worldview consistently explains why humans are capable of recognizing and understanding the created order, acknowledging that humanity is created in the image of God and possess cognitive abilities and (generally) reliable sense organs. Consequently, the Christian worldview is logically consistent, and in comparison to naturalistic philosophies, it proves superior in explanatory power and

Open Document