Pressure Ulcer Risk Assessment Case Study

523 Words2 Pages

Objectives:

This study investigated whether the risk assessment strategy, organized versus clinical judgment, impacts pressure ulcer prevalence or prevention procedures. Both Norway and Ireland were picked, Norway has constrained utilization of formal organized risk assessment and Ireland has routine utilization of formal structured risk assessment are two medicinal services setting. They chose one clinical destination, within each of these two countries, as centres for research investigating the utilization and effect of formal organized pressure ulcer risk assessment. As a result, the main point of this study was to decide the distinction in utilizing formal organized risk assessment in the republic of Ireland and clinical judgment alone in Norway.

Methods: …show more content…

In each nation one urban intense care hospital setting was chosen to take part. A clinical site in Ireland connected with formal organized risk assessment utilizing the Maelor Score while in Norway they utilized clinical judgment alone. Firstly, they started with data collection, which was about making checklist data related to pressure ulcer risk assessment, prevention practices and patient education. This particular checklist was utilized effectively within the Irish health-care setting and commonplace to the research group. All patients were estimated for risk using the Braden pressure ulcer risk assessment tool.22 PUs were assessed using the European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (EPUAP ) pressure ulcer grading system.23 In Norway, five nurses were given a half-day instruction session. These sessions associated to pressure ulcer risk assessment, grading, ‪propagation‬, and information accumulation with reference to the checklist utilized for this study. Information were gathered more than one day in each

Open Document