(iii) general ledgers; and (iv) time billing records. (f) Power2 allege that the loss of the Lost Data had a significant impact on the value of the accounting business operated by Power2. Instructions 1. You are required to read the Pleadings and identify to us the source documents and instructions, to the extent not already provided in writing, and that you consider will be necessary in order for you to provide an opinion as to the costs incurred and are to be incurred by Power2 as a consequence of the loss of the Lost Data and the need to reinstate the Lost Data. 2. Should you require an inspection of Power2’s premises and facilities, or access to particular business records of Power2, that should be arranged through this firm with prior notice of …show more content…
4. Please ensure your opinion is supported by any calculations appropriate and any data which you regard as relevant or have had regard to in the preparation of your opinion. Expert Witness Code of Conduct 1. It is anticipated that any report prepared by you is likely to be relied upon in proceedings before the Supreme Court of Queensland. 2. Consequently, we attach hereto a copy of the Expert Witness Code of Conduct found at Part 5, Division 2, Rules 426, 427 and 428 of the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 1999. The Code of Conduct provides that a person engaged as an expert witness has an overriding duty to assist the Court impartially on matters relevant to the area of expertise of the witness, and that an expert witness is not an advocate for a
In future research, the opinion should be provided in multiple aspects and by more powerful evidences.
You are tasked with finding a case where a prosecutor committed an ethical violation. You are to then draft a paper detailing the conduct that was deemed wrongful and why. ? What type of punishment, if any was imposed? Do you agree with this?
The Cameron Hooker case illustrated that when it comes to expert testimony more than just the testimony itself that is important. The credibility of the expert witness and how they are perceived by the judge and jury is equally as important as the information they are sharing.
- evaluate the survival of evidence in this area and investigate the reasons for the
This incorporated the intending to guarantee that the tools and facilities are placed to ensure the data is gathered in the appropriate way and the GCU employees are appropriate train, aware and drilled in the prerequisites so any proof gathered and put away is done as such in a way that will make it permissible in any lawful or inside disciplinary procedures. They have to decide the prerequisite on how that confirms it will be gathered without obstructions with the GCU organization process, an orderly way process that confirms capacity can altogether decrease the expenses and time of an interior examination, such as a way that the GCU deal with confirms
Which rule in the AICPA Code of Conduct is most related to Article 1.5 of the California Accountancy Act? Explain your conclusion.
The case study that will be focused in this essay, will be the case Published by UC Berkley School of law. A Judge received a public reprimand for “friending” an attorney during a trail. This case was an interesting case, at first the thought of a judge becoming friends with an attorney did not spark any form of controversy in my mind at first. Yet, the text presents us with norms in terms of conduct. These norms are Independence, Impartiality, Integrity, and accountability.
Fradella, H.F. (2006) Why judges should admit expert testimony on the unreliability of eyewitness testimony. Federal Courts Law Review. Retrieved from http://www.fclr.org/fclr/articles/html/2006/fedctslrev3.pdf
5. When the computer service bureau destroys or erases records, should the erasure be verified by the bureau to the physician?
...d the evidence that you have used. Weigh up the two (or more) sides of the argument.
In about ½ of a page (single-spaced), please state whether you agree, disagree, or have a mixed opinion regarding the following statement and argue, via evidence and claims from what you have learned in class, why you have picked your stated position. Be sure to comprehensively explain and support your reasoning.
“Witness for the Prosecution” superbly demonstrated a realist view of the operating procedures in a courtroom. The actors within the courtroom were easy to identify, and the steps transitioned smoothly from the arrest to the reading of the verdict. The murder trial of Leonard Vole provided realistic insight into how laws on the books are used in courtroom proceedings. With the inferior elements noted, the superior element of the court system in “Witness for the Prosecution” was the use of the adversary system. Both sides of the adversary system were flawlessly protrayed when the prosecution and defense squared off in the courtroom.
Critically review the evidence to assess its validity (is the information established correct, does it ha...
The accused is allowed to prove his good character, either- examination in chief or by cross-examination. But so far as concerns proof of the good character of accused by another witness, what must be shown is, not particular good acts by him, but his reputation in the community in general. The accused may adduce evidence of his good character in disposal of his guilt. The witness’s own opinion of his character is irrelevant. The evidence of character is primarily relevant as to credibility i.e. it makes his testimony more worthy of belief.
There were several areas that piqued my interest and made me want to learn more such as ethics, more importantly, the need to be ethical in the collection of evidence, processing of evidence, and the testimony that is given in trial. The need to be ethical should be expected as part of a person’s character, especially when presenting something that could prove guilt or innocence, naïve as that might sound. However, we live in the real world and someone’s ethical behavior can come into question.