Position Paper

622 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Ethics for testing animals

Ethical Issue: Testing on animals Position perspective: Testing on animals is not right
Testing on animals is morally wrong thing to do since animals have a life too, so their life is worth the same as a human being’s life. So, why should humans test on animals for their own safety and benefit? In my opinion it is totally wrong to test on animals because they have a life too and their lives weigh the same importance as human being life. It does not matter whether scientists are testing on rats, dogs or dolphin since they all are important for our ecosystem to continue functioning just like humans.
Testing on animals is actually very harmful for the animals as the chemicals or drugs may kill them. Also, it is cruel and selfishness since scientists are experimenting on animals for their own benefits without even thinking about the poor animals. Animal testing kills so many innocent animals every year since researchers used animals as tools for human medications and testing cosmetics on the animals gives them a painful death in most cases. As well, dissection in science classes is also another form of testing since the students open up the animal’s body just to find out how it works without even feeling pity for that animal.
Some people would agree to test on rats but not on dogs since they have a pet dog. So, for few there is like a hierarchy which clearly states that for some animals testing is okay but for not for others. Few people would argue that testing is not alright on animals even if they are non-vegetarian and they eat animals. According to me...

... middle of paper ...

...nefits for humans and their society. A veil of ignorant point of view would completely neglect that harm humans are doing to the poor animals by experimenting on them as this perspective would only focus on the advantages of animal testing. The golden mean perspective would feel that animal testing is not right in all circumstances but sometimes experimenting on animals can be right as it can be beneficial for humans although harmful for animals at the same time too.

References Berlin, Ann. “Animal Testing: Why it is Morally Offensive.” Animal Liberation Front.com. 13 Nov. 2006. Web. 27 June 2014.
Chivers, Tom. “Animal testing is still necessary, despite the claims of animal protestors.” The Telegraph. 16 Mar. 2013. Web. 27 June 2014.

Show More
Related

  • The Necessity of Animal Testing

    980 Words  | 2 Pages

    The types of experiments performed at the University of Buffalo and the University of California depicts just some of the few horrors of animal testing. According to the article, during these experimentations the eyes of monkeys were implanted with metal coils into their eye sockets in order to study movement ("Update: Animal Testing"). Often times animals are tested upon in laboratories, living in cold isolated environments. The moral aspect of the debate, is whether or not animals should be utilized and later euthanized for the purpose of human benefit, especially when only one party decides. As a resu...

    Read More

  • Animal Testing Dbq

    597 Words  | 2 Pages

    One must remember that scientists who carry out animal testing are human to and most definitely do feel some sense of guilt using these animals for the sole reason to benefit mankind. However, “if there were good alternatives to animals that worked better or as well, for less money and hassle, scientists would use them” (Source D). Many believe that animals testing is wrong, but they must understand that at the current time there is no other option. It is difficult to find a different practice has been so substantial and has improved millions of lives and society as a whole. Animal testing, though the testing on animals may not be the best option, the after effects of testing has been successful over the past decades and will continue on this path as scientists and researchers gain more knowledge. There may be a point in time that society becomes so better off that there would be no more need to test

    Read More

  • Argumentative Essay: We Must Eliminate Animal Testing

    613 Words  | 2 Pages

    The practice of using animals for testing has been a controversial issue over the past thirty years. Animal testing is a morally debated practice. The question is whether animal testing is morally right or wrong. This paper will present both sides of this issue as well as my own opinion.

    Read More

  • Annotated Bibliography On Animal Testing

    1631 Words  | 4 Pages

    This is important because understanding the way in which this happens, attitudes towards animal testing, are formed and how they spread will likely have an impact on public policy on animal welfare and animal rights activism. The information presented and the results will justify my view on animal testing and why it should be banned from scientific reasonings. (75 words)

    Read More

  • The Pros of Animal Testing

    1427 Words  | 3 Pages

    Animal testing is a subject appalled by many people. It is considered to be unethical, inhumane, and downright cruel. One of these reasons for the opposition of animal experimentation is due to the belief shared by many animal activist groups, such as PETA, that animals are kept in appalling living conditions in research facilities. Reasons to believe this are caused by minor instances of laboratories not abiding the law. However, despite these instances the welfare of test animals are preserved by many laws and regulatio...

    Read More

  • Animal Testing Cruel And Inhumane

    532 Words  | 2 Pages

    Over 100 Million animals are burned, crippled, poisoned and abused in testing labs every year. Animals are used to test the safety of products, advance scientific research, and develop models to study disease and to develop new medical treatments, all for the sake of mankind. Animals should not be used for scientific research because animal testing is inhumane, other testing methods now exist, and animals are very different from human beings. While animal testing has led to many life-saving cures, animal testing is cruel and inhumane because it involves inflicting pain and harm on the test subject to study its effects and remedies. Testing involves physically restraining, force-feeding, and depriving animals of food and water.

    Read More

  • Sabin's Article: Why Animal Testing Is Not Wrong?

    721 Words  | 2 Pages

    Medical sciences are required to keep us healthy when there are diseases spreading and animal testing is a key part of this research. Animal test is not wrong because it is the only way to keep ahead in the arms race against disease. Disease keep changing and evolving so scientist must keep researching and making stronger, more potent medicines to combat them. Thus we must use living creatures as test subject for the medicines.

    Read More

  • The Necessities of Animal Experimentation

    1270 Words  | 3 Pages

    ...Because people see animal testing procedures as unethical and immoral, it’s important for them to consider what their health would be like without the process—potentially afflicted with incurable illnesses. Continuing the animal experimenting process can only prove beneficial in promoting fewer ailments and cures to existing and future diseases.

    Read More

  • Opposing Views On Animal Experimentation

    1212 Words  | 3 Pages

    Opposing Views on Animal Experimentation Animal experimentation sends a different message to everyone. The two sides are made of those who think animal testing is beneficial for life and those who think it is unethical and wrong. Those who find these tests to be beneficial are consist of researchers, scientists, and other observers. People and groups who perceive these tests to be cruel and unethical, consist of animal rights activists and organizations that fight for animals rights, such as PETA and ASPCA. Though there are many differences between the two sides, there are also a few similarities.

    Read More

  • Animal Testing: What if You Were in Their Place?

    1622 Words  | 4 Pages

    First of all, animal testing is immoral because it involves harming or killing animals for the purpose of “science”. Animals that are tested on are enslaved, beaten, burned, poisoned, electr...

    Read More

  • Argumentative Essay On Animal Testing

    771 Words  | 2 Pages

    Animal testing is an immoral, heinous, atrocious act. One should never put an animal before his own life; we are all here on earth due to some strand of evolution or the other, making prejudice and other discriminations (man or not) obsolete and meaningless. Those who would think themselves above another creature are each failures in their own individual way. The rights of animals cannot be questioned, it is an inalienable fact that most do not understand, when given thought that is free of bias and the plague of arrogance, as Arthur Schopenhauer once said: “The assumption that animals are without rights and the illusion that our treatment of them has no moral significance is a positively outrageous example of Western crudity and barbarity. Universal compassion is the only guarantee of morality.” In a society as unquestionably advanced as man, a society in which even the consumption of meat is an indulgence and in no way necessary, the duty of treating all life with anything more than a central nervous system is nothing less than a law.

    Read More

  • Ethical Ethics Of Animal Testing

    700 Words  | 2 Pages

    Every year approximately 100 million animals are killed as a part of scientific research in the United States alone. Animal testing is a highly controversial practice in the modern world. There are records of animals being used in biological and medicinal research as far back as 384 BCE with the ancient Greek philosopher Aristotle. Many people believe animal testing is unethical as it is bringing harm to animals in order to benefit humans. Ever since the beginning of this practice, animal testing has been used for a variety of purposes, all of which are inhumane and unethical.

    Read More

  • The History of Animal Experimentation and Testing

    964 Words  | 2 Pages

    Animal testing is a controversial topic with two main sides of the argument. The side apposing animal testing states it is unethical and inhumane; that animals have a right to choose where and how they live instead of being subjected to experiments. The view is that all living organism have a right of freedom; it is a right, not a privilege. The side for animal testing thinks that it should continue, without animal testing there would be fewer medical and scientific breakthroughs. This side states that the outcome is worth the investment of testing on animals. The argument surrounding animal testing is older than the United States of America, dating back to the 1650’s when Edmund O’Meara stated that vivisection, the dissection of live animals, is an unnatural act. Although this is one of the first major oppositions to animal testing, animal testing was being practiced for millennia beforehand. There are two sides apposing each other in the argument of animal testing, and the argument is one of the oldest arguments still being debated today.

    Read More

  • Is Animal Testing Necessary?

    2044 Words  | 5 Pages

    For years animal testing has been a very controversial issue around the globe. Animal testing has been very beneficial to people, but has cause an up stir to animal rights activists and organizations like PETA. “The earliest references to animal ex...

    Read More

  • Animal Testing Should be Banned

    1000 Words  | 2 Pages

    First of all, animal testing should be banned in order to protect the rights of animals. In other words, animals’ rights are infringed by experimenting on them. Animals and humans are similar in many ways. To begin with, they have similar levels of biological complexity. They both are aware that they exist and they both make conscious choices. Philosophy professor at North Carolina State University Tom Regan points out "Animals have a basic moral right to respectful treatment. This inherent value is not respected when animals are reduced to being mere tools in a scientific experiment." (F. B. Orlans) Experimentation on an animal ...

    Read More

More about Position Paper

Open Document