Politics and the Art of Compromise

1042 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Compromise in politics essays

Politics and the Art of Compromise

Politics is referred to as the "art of compromise". It

is essential to a democratic society. Elected officials meet in

legislative chambers to hammer out policies that all constituents

can live with. Successful politicians learn early on the

survival value of compromise. Economist Donald Wittman (1995:

154) correctly observes, "That is what good politicians do:

create coalitions and find acceptable compromises." Also

political philosopher Jean Bethke Elshtain (1995: 61) states "But

compromise is not a mediocre way to do politics; it is an

adventure, the only way to do democratic politics."

II. Reasons why compromise is essential.

Politicians need to be able to compromise and be good

at bargaining with other elected officials. One reason is that in

order to get what is important to them, they must be willing to

negotiate with others who also want support, it's is a trade off

in that each wants support for the their cause and in turn, must

support someone else's cause as well. They must do this type of

bargaining in order to win enough support to get the votes

necessary to win for their constituents. If the constituents

don't see that the elected official can bring home the bacon,

they won't vote for them in the next election. In other words,

without compromise, nothing will be acheived for the

contituency, and as a result the official will not likely

continue to hold office for long.

By the same token, no politicians or voters, will get everything

they want. There must be a majority to implement policy, which

means that means that almost every time supporters of policy will ...

... middle of paper ...

...y deserve to have a voice

about all policy making which goes on behind closed doors, and

away from public view. However, compromise should be more open

and accepted by the public, criticized and debated upon, in order

for our society to be considered a true democracy.

Bibliography:

Sources

Bush, G. (1996) "Notable & Quotable." In Wall Street

Journal, 26 January: A10.

Crew, M.A., and Twight, C. (1990) "On the Efficiency of

Law: A Public Choice Perspective." Public Choice

66:15-36

Elshtain. J.B. (1995) Democracy on Trial. New York:

Basic Books.

Sinclair, B. (1996) Vote for Me: Politics in America.

American Political Science Association, September,

1996.

Wittman, D.A. (1995) The Myth of Democratic Failure.

Chicago: University of Chicago

Show More
Related

  • The Pros And Cons Of Political Party Power

    1392 Words  | 3 Pages

    There has been much speculation whether political parties have become too strong in American politics and if that is a good or bad thing. My belief is that political party power in the United States is just about right where I believe that there are some instances where political parties have been in situations where they have too much power and instances where it is moderate. First off, political parties are crucial to our democratic government because it is composed of a group of people that the constituents elect to represent their issues or achieve a common goal. Being part of a group that shares your common interests or goals is more powerful than tackling an issue by your self. It gives you more voice and power in government. Also, political

    Read More

  • The Fit Stop Case Study

    1401 Words  | 3 Pages

    Appelbaum, J.D. (1994). "The Law of the United States."

    Read More

  • Partnership and Negotiaton: Updates to the Constitution of the US

    1103 Words  | 3 Pages

    In 1777, the Articles of Confederation were written and became our first plan for governing the United States. They were founded on the ideals of Federalism – limited government, upholding the authority of state governments and equality between states. At the time, this form of government was crucial to prevent tyranny, in addition to organizing and effectively fighting the Revolutionary War. It also allowed us to borrow money, operate a military, ban slavery in the west, and create new states. There are current proposals to replace the Confederation with updated system outlined in the “Constitution.” But, should we even consider making changes? After all, Patrick Henry said, "The Confederation, this despised government, merits, in my opinion, the highest encomium--it carried us through a long and dangerous war; it rendered us victorious in that bloody conflict with a powerful nation; it has secured us a territory greater than any European monarch possesses--and shall a government which has been thus strong and vigorous, be accused of imbecility, and abandoned for want of energy?" If it got us through the revolutionary war, surely it can still suffice, right?

    Read More

  • Three Fifth Compromise Analysis

    147 Words  | 1 Pages

    The delegates of Congress gathered to ratify the new Constitution in 1787, had to agree in many compromises, two of the biggest ones were the Great Compromise and the Three-Fifth Compromise. The Great Compromise also called The Connecticut framed mainly by Sherman, resolved the debate between the Virginia plan supporters and the New Jersey plan supporters on the biggest issue of the debate centered on how many representative each state should have in the Congress. The Three-Fifth Compromise resolved the debates over slavery, taxation, and representation in the lower house, mostly between the southern states seeking more representation in the lower house and wanted the slaves to be counted, and northern states that wanted the slaves to be taxed

    Read More

  • The Middle Ground Summary

    125 Words  | 1 Pages

    A historian at the University of Washington, Richard White, took a close look at ethnic, cultural, and racial interactions between whites, Hispanics, blacks, and Indians. In his book The Middle Ground: Indians, Empires, and Republics in the Great Lakes Region, 1650-1815, he discusses the geographic area from the Great Lakes to the upper Mississippi basin and the social terrain. His term “middle ground” was not created by the interaction between conquerors and conquered or by adaption of a defeated people (Birzer, 2014). Instead, the middle ground was the result of adjustments and accommodations made as both the Algonquins and the Europeans sought benefits from each other and tried to adjust to the new social order. All people were forced to

    Read More

  • Bipartisanship: The Parties Within Government and Agreement

    1410 Words  | 3 Pages

    In today’s political world, bipartisanship has become nothing more than something that comes up once in a while within congress; it is something that people either agree with or don’t. This essay will include what bipartisanship is, how it works, and the good things it has accomplished.

    Read More

  • The Great Compromise

    558 Words  | 2 Pages

    The foundation of the American Constitution was established to form a stable government through conflict and compromise. The Virginia Plan and the New Jersey Plan combined formed The Great Compromise. Later, The Three-Fifths Compromise and The Commerce Compromise were also established. These all created a stable form of government.

    Read More

  • Cheap Talk Mediation And Diplomacy

    2159 Words  | 5 Pages

    The concept of “cheap talk” focuses on the analysis of how much information can dependably be forwarded when the communication is direct and costless. Biased experts tend to share noisy information with the decision makers. One way in which the decision makers can enhance the exchange of information is to extend communication. Additionally, he or she must try to seek advice from additional experts. Ultimately, writing contracts with the expert can further increase the credibility of the informational transmission. Theoretically, cheap talk is costless and therefore is not expected to have a major impact on the outcomes of interstate communication. As opposed to the cheap talk model, standard “costly signalling” is predicted to provoke a more fluid transmission of information between two actors in the international system. It is precisely the cost of signalling what gives validity to the information provided. As suggested by Farrell and Rabin, authors of previous literature on cheap talk are divided in opinion. Some scholars argue that cheap talk is rather useless, while others believe that it it is helpful in interstate communication and can actually improve the advantages of both sides. While examining the literature on cheap talk, it is important to highlight additional tools of international communication, such as diplomacy and mediation. The analysis of these issues provides a close insight into the credibility of arguments regarding cheap talk. Several historical cases serve as examples of costly signalling and its outcomes, one of the most recent ones being NATO's show of strength prior to the...

    Read More

  • Political Philosophy

    2473 Words  | 5 Pages

    Every country in the world has a government that sets laws to keep order and peace. Not every government can be just in its ruling, but what defines a just ruling? And does anyone truly have the right to control others? Throughout time different types of governments have been established. As history progressed most governments were overthrown because of the laws that were imposed. Emperors and Kings changed to Presidents and Prime Ministers. This was caused by revolutions because the people did not like the way they were being ruled. But should people be ruled in the first place? Who should have the right to do such a thing? Today, the most powerful countries are run by democracy. But what is its purpose? It is supposed to carry out the will of the majority. So this means that someone will always be unhappy. Political philosophy deals with these sort of issues. Great minds such as Plato, Aristotle, Voltaire and Locke have looked at these issues and have tried to find the best possible answers.

    Read More

  • power and politics

    2045 Words  | 5 Pages

    It is not about “what you do”, “it is about who you are and who you know”. As employees, we have all heard sayings like this before when it comes to the business world. The “power and politic” mindset is a direct result of the type of tug of war experienced for millions of years; from prehistoric times through modern day. Ever since Ugha smashed Mugha in the head with a club back in prehistoric times, politics have been around in the workplace. Politics are a subliminal fight for survival and it actually happens in personal lives as much as it does in our work lives. Politics can go hand in hand with power, just as night follows the day. Many of the political situations that occur within a corporation are a result of growth and change. However, part of the task of becoming a viable asset to a corporation is to look beyond the surface and find out where the company is heading as a result of these changes. In this way, employees can position themselves to be a positive part of the growth and change.

    Read More

  • Negotiation In Negotiation

    539 Words  | 2 Pages

    To attract good luck need to learn the art of negotiation . It is therefore important that you read this post .

    Read More

  • Political Philosophy

    1755 Words  | 4 Pages

    Aristotle, Locke, and Hobbes all place a great deal of importance on the state of nature and how it relates to the origin of political bodies. Each one, however, has a different conception of what a natural state is, and ultimately, this leads to a different conception of what a government should be, based on this natural state. Aristotle’s feelings on the natural state of man is much different than that of modern philosophers and leads to a construction of government in and of itself; government for Hobbes and Locke is a departure from the natural state of man.

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Unity And Compromise

    556 Words  | 2 Pages

    The young nation of the United States was built on unity and compromise between the states and their people. The Great Compromise gave an even representation to small and large states. The Missouri Compromise only allowed slavery below the 36’ 30” line, separating the north from the south. Both of these agreements were accepted within the United States along with others. But as time when on compromises were less agreed upon and the differences between the North and the South. These differences and the unwillingness to cooperate is what pushed the States to the brink of Civil War in 1860.

    Read More

  • Politics In Max Weber's Theory Of Politics

    789 Words  | 2 Pages

    Although there is evidence that politics can be unproductive, corrupt, and backwards, Weber believes that that is part of the deal. As long as whoever emerges themselves in politics treat it as a personal vocation, or as a life mission, the patience and expertise required to deal with unresponsive colleagues, public backlash, two steps forward and one step back tactics will help to accelerate the possibilities that politics can unfold within a society.

    Read More

  • My Own Understanding Of Politics

    822 Words  | 2 Pages

    Negotiation over a car, or anything of interest involves a distribution of attention from one side to another. Just as a car has a seller and a buyer, the government has different political parties, and each issue has a group for and against it. Gaining cooperation from the other side requires strategy.

    Read More

More about Politics and the Art of Compromise

Open Document