Polis Of Athens

1612 Words4 Pages

The Ancient Greeks or the “Hellenes”, as they called themselves, did not have a united government. Each group of people in their particular location developed their own states. These city-states, or “polis” were all independent from each other and had their own governments. Polis would typically include some area around the city that had outlying towns and farms. Among these polis, one of the most well-known is the city-state of Athens1. In the history of government and politics, Athens is said to hold a central place. According to Whedbee, “... Athens was the cradle of philosophy, literature, art and – most importantly – the birth place of civil liberties...”2. The earliest and most primitive Indo-European political organizations consisted …show more content…

They always came from nobility and usually from a family that was commercially orientated. They tended to come into power from successful pro-commerce relations following an extended period of struggle and because of this, they were more often found in commercially oriented polis, such as Athens, Corinth, and Argos. Tyrants, due to their interest in commerce, typically enacted pro-growth policies (such as investment in infrastructure) and enacted legislature that standardized weights and measures. Usually, the end of a tyrant's reign ended with death or exile, but sometimes he might be succeeded by his son, usually only for a generation or two though6. Fleck and Hanssen write that, “... Many of the poleis where tyrants ruled became the broadest, most inclusive democracies of the Classical period”7. According to data collected by Fleck and Hanssen, ten out of eleven polis that had tyrannies during the Archaic period are listed as democracies during the Classical period. While of the thirty-five polis that did not have tyrannies during the Archaic period, only nine are listed as democracies during the Classical period (the other twenty-six are listed as …show more content…

Historically accounts provide much reference to this, however, according to Fleck and Hanssen, there is no good direct measures of wealth at the level of the polis. Because of this, it is very difficult to make an estimation of the effects of political institutions and types of government on wealth. However, there can be a proxy for wealth: public buildings. Public buildings were present in every polis, but wealthy polis had many more. Public buildings were costly and large, therefore, they require substantial wealth to construct. According to the data, presented by Fleck and Hanssen, democracies that wre former tyrannies have a higher number of public buildings than democracies that were never tyrannies. Non-democratic forms of government, both former and never tyrannies, have a lower number of public buildings as well.

Open Document