Police Misconduct Research Paper

1459 Words3 Pages

In 1991 the beating of Rodney King was videotaped and publicized throughout America (Son) . For many people this was their first time witnessing police abuse. The four policemen that were involved were subjected to a trial but were acquitted of their charges which included; use of excess force and assault. This event took place 27 years ago, today instances such as this take place almost every day. Police misconduct has been a recurring problem throughout the twentieth century and well into the twenty first century (Son, pg 179). When it comes to interactions with civilians, “...police officers are prohibited from (1) using unnecessary Force, (2) Abusing their authority, (3) speaking Discourteously, or (4) using Offensive language, all captured …show more content…

A statement in Wolfes study recites, “Police officers…..are not only responsible for enforcing laws and protecting the public but also are entrusted to represent order and justice in society” (332). When police are involved in a sort of misconduct, this not only negatively affects the police, it also affects the community. The integrity of police and their department is important when trying to establish a positive relationship with civilians. When police officers commit crimes, the integrity of the whole department is questioned. Jackman reports that at least 1,100 officers are arrested a year for misconduct. Many cases of misconduct go unreported, and police involved are never reprimanded. An unspoken code known within police called the ‘code of silence’ is a main factor on why misconduct is never reported. The code of silence is, “...the informal prohibition of reporting misconduct by fellow police officers” (Sanja, 172). The code of silence degrades police integrity. In an article titled “Code of Silence”, the author states that the code of silence “..encourages a context of disregard for citizens’ rights..”. With police willingly lying and not reporting misconduct committed by their coworkers, trust from civilians will slowly deteriorate. In Sanjas’ study, he found that “In a nationwide study of police officers, one of six police officers adhered to the view that “the code of silence is an essential part” of good policing...” (173). If lying to a department head and hiding unacceptable behavior is quote-unquote ‘good policing’ what does this mean to civilians? In the Baltimore corruption case, a man who was harassed by an officer-involved stated, “I feel free,” he said, crying. “I feel safe. I don’t have to watch police cars coming and run fast, worrying that’s him” (Weiner). Reading this statement, how does this reflect the department. Civilians should feel safer when they see law

Open Document