More handpicked essays just for you.
Human involvement in animal extinction
Need and importance of environmental education
Human involvement in animal extinction
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Human involvement in animal extinction
The author speaks in first person through the eyes of a polar bear. He addresses the audience explaining how humans/mankind are killing off many species, such as the polar bear, by polluting the Earth. The author makes it clear, by addressing the audience directly, the positive and negative impact humans can make on the situation at hand. He uses words like “you” to talk directly to the reader and make them realize that they are not helping the problem. He uses many types of rhetorical devices in hopes to persuade and inform you to help stop the problem before it is too late. The author uses diction in an ironic way, claiming that we view polar bears as “monsters” but really we are the real monsters by polluting this Earth the way we are.
John McPhee used similes throughout his essay “Under the Snow”. One of his similes was him describing how a researcher put the bear in a doughnut shape. It was to explain to the audience that the bear was wrapped around with room between her legs for the bear cubs to lay when they are in hibernation. He describes the movement of the bears and the bear cubs like clowns coming out of a compact car. The similes help the audience see how the moved and how they were placed after the researcher moved them.
Jonathan Kozol revealed the early period’s situation of education in American schools in his article Savage Inequalities. It seems like during that period, the inequality existed everywhere and no one had the ability to change it; however, Kozol tried his best to turn around this situation and keep track of all he saw. In the article, he used rhetorical strategies effectively to describe what he saw in that situation, such as pathos, logos and ethos.
“How to poison the earth” by Linnea Saukko can be seen in two different aspects. The first one would be by looking at it in a literal way, in which it will make it a very harsh, inhumane and cold text. On the other hand, it could be seen as a satire, sarcastic and ironic text in which Saukko expects to catch the reader’s attention. Saukko exaggerates the sarcasm, and satire in her writing in order to make the readers realize and understand the main purpose of her essay, which is to warn readers about threats to the future of our planet.
In Orwell’s reflective narrative, “Shooting an Elephant”, he reveals the truth on imperialism. Through the utilization of irony and the method of appeals, Orwell shows the reader that imperialism is just a definition because the people are in control, not Britain.
In the book Into the Wild, Jon Krakauer wrote about Christopher McCandless, a nature lover in search for independence, in a mysterious and hopeful experience. Even though Krakauer tells us McCandless was going to die from the beginning, he still gave him a chance for survival. As a reader I wanted McCandless to survive. In Into the Wild, Krakauer gave McCandless a unique perspective. He was a smart and unique person that wanted to be completely free from society. Krakauer included comments from people that said McCandless was crazy, and his death was his own mistake. However, Krakauer is able to make him seem like a brave person. The connections between other hikers and himself helped in the explanation of McCandless’s rational actions. Krakauer is able to make McCandless look like a normal person, but unique from this generation. In order for Krakauer to make Christopher McCandless not look like a crazy person, but a special person, I will analyze the persuading style that Krakauer used in Into the Wild that made us believe McCandless was a regular young adult.
Reputable environmentalist Janisse Ray in her narrative “Altar Call to True Believers” uses pathos, logos, and ethos efficiently to create a convincing kyros for her essay. To start off she uses ethos. She admits her own faults, capturing the reader’s attention as well as “playing” upon the readers trust and understanding. Next she uses pathos. Ms. Ray identifies with her audience and displays her own background to gain more of the reader’s empathy. Lastly, she capitalizes on logos. Janisse logically forges an ideological circumstance for what, how, and why the people of planet earth should be doing to help the environment. In this essay I will argue that Ray’s rhetoric succeeds due to the empathy she establishes with her audience by self depreciation.
Mr. McKibben provides a strong argument call of action for everyone to take action against global warming. But he doesn 't just want action, Mr. Mckibben is demanding action now, and lots of it. Throughout the passage, Meltdown: Running Our of Time on Global Warming, the reader can examine the many ways that McKibben attempts to persuade others to join his movement. When one examines Bill McKibben 's use of rhetoric appeals, persuasive fallacies, and counter augments, A reader can analyze and understand the real claim that the writer is attempting to address.
McKibben’s writing style makes it difficult for readers to truly understand the argument he presents; therefore, they are gullible to accepting his opinions. McKibben embarks on a rampage in this article, seeming to continuously ramble on with concepts that fly over the average person’s head. He uses words such as “Class C forest,” “A-2 forest,” “peak-load electricity,” “geothermal drilling,” and “hydrogen sulfide emissions.” McKibben must not be thinking of his audience because for the audience to grasp his argument thoroughly he needs to define these concepts well. If he were writing for a science magazine in which his audience would be well educated in environmental issues, his writing style would be accepted. But this article appeared in Rolling Stone where the audience is not educated on these issues. His bitter and intense voice makes the reader feel as if th...
The environment has become a popular topic this year due to our on-going drought. It has always been a serious issue; something Saukko informs us in her sarcastic essay “How to Poison the Earth”. She uses sarcasm and irony in her essay hoping her readers will do the complete opposite of what she is saying because of the stress she puts on the harming chemicals we use every day. We do not appreciate our environment and take it for granted. This ideal is what Ehrlich's essay “Chronicles of Ice” focuses on by using analogies and scientific definitions to describe aspects of glaciers. The melting of the glaciers introduces us to the topic of global warming and how our society is doing nothing to stop it from getting worse. Gawande’s “The Cancer-Cluster
Pollan’s article provides a solid base to the conversation, defining what to do in order to eat healthy. Holding this concept of eating healthy, Joe Pinsker in “Why So Many Rich Kids Come to Enjoy the Taste of Healthier Foods” enters into the conversation and questions the connection of difference in families’ income and how healthy children eat (129-132). He argues that how much families earn largely affect how healthy children eat — income is one of the most important factors preventing people from eating healthy (129-132). In his article, Pinsker utilizes a study done by Caitlin Daniel to illustrate that level of income does affect children’s diet (130). In Daniel’s research, among 75 Boston-area parents, those rich families value children’s healthy diet more than food wasted when children refused to accept those healthier but
In chapter 8 of the book, Wilding in America, we discussed in the classroom about the global warming changes in United States, wilding against humanity, and political campaign against our environment. These are the most fundamental points being discussed in the presentation of wilding against the environment. The problem about global warming is that we the people are the cause of global warming changing. For instance, United States burn more oil, coal, and other fossil fuels that pours out catastrophic level of greenhouse creating a perfect storm. We often say that big companies are the reason why are climate changes but we are also part of the effects on global warming because of the American Dream. James Hansen, Columbian professor
Seuss’ The Lorax, the plot follows a flashback of how the Once-ler dismantled the environment by opening factories, profiting off of Truffula trees. Despite being warned by the Lorax, an advocate for the voiceless flora and fauna, the Once-ler continues in his greed until he strips the land of all materials. The Lorax, with his morale shattered, leaves behind a single word: “UNLESS”. After living the rest of his life with regret, the Once-ler comes to realize the imperative meaning behind the clue. “UNLESS someone like you cares a whole awful lot, nothing is going to get better. It’s not” (Seuss 6 ). Global warming is backed by irrefutable facts, narrowing down the cause to human disruption through careless carbon emissions. Just as if society were the Once-ler, the effects are under blatantly there begging for recognition. In contrast to The Lorax, societies story doesn’t have to end in the same way. The first step is for all people to identify Climate Change as a harrowing dilemma. Attempts to dispel Global Warming are directly related to those who so stubbornly do not want their industries to die; a selfish ploy that values money more than life. In the face of adversity, the world needs those who are willing to take a stand. It is time for the “Lorax’s” of the world to call attention to rising sea levels, environmental calamities, devastating storms, droughts, and the displacement of all life forms. In response to Global warming, reduce fossil fuels, plant trees, reduce waste products, conserve, conserve, and then conserve some more. Regardless of the tree huggers or the businessman, climate change is everyone’s problem. This is our planet. This is our home. It is our
The Letter from Birmingham Jail was written by Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. in April of 1963. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. was one of several civil rights activists who were arrested in Birmingham Alabama, after protesting against racial injustices in Alabama. Dr. King wrote this letter in response to a statement titled A Call for Unity, which was published on Good Friday by eight of his fellow clergymen from Alabama. Dr. King uses his letter to eloquently refute the article. In the letter dr. king uses many vivid logos, ethos, and pathos to get his point across. Dr. King writes things in his letter that if any other person even dared to write the people would consider them crazy.
In his emotional appeal, Bogard primarily uses diction to create a subtle emotional feeling within his audiences. Using strong phrases such as “bulldozer” or “wrecking habitats and disrupting ecosystems” in describing light pollution, he is able to mold the reader’s feelings into having a negative opinion towards this problem, whether the reader is conscious of it or not. However, when discussing natural darkness, he uses lighter phrases such as “beauty” or “irreplaceable value” that capture his reader’s hearts and assists in convincing them of preserving the darkness. Moreover, personal pronouns continue to come in play as they provide the emotional connection with the audience. By using the pronouns such as “we” or “our,” Bogard goes beyond making this a personal problem and demonstrates it as a problem that everyone shares. He makes his audience become involved as he reveals the detrimental impact light pollution has on them and their environment. By doing so, his audience can be more easily persuaded to share his viewpoint as they do not want to agree to anything that can harm them or their children. Through his use of pathos, Bogard links his audience to his viewpoint, persuading them of the beauty of the world through their emotions.
He Goes to explain how Animal agriculture is the leading cause to human climate change, while also consuming 1/3 of the planets water and 45% of the earths land. it's also the leading cause for environmental destruction such as deforestation, world hunger and water scarcity . 91% of the land loss from the amazon rainforests is due to animal