In his poem, “One of the Monkeys,” Nicholas Johnson describes monkeys typing Shakespeare while being observed by a crowd of strangers. They are writing “Hamlet” by Shakespeare, which they have never read. Johnson’s poem explains the process of writing and the feelings associated with it. He does not celebrate or criticize the process; rather, he lists the feelings without the use of human examples. Johnson gives insight into the emotions of writing. He proves that writing is not bland, and that it can involve amusement, confusion, anguish, and motivation.
Johnson sets a tone for the reader that changes over time in order to express an alteration in emotion. He first starts comically and unrealistically, saying, “I’m one of the monkeys they’ve got typing,” which is meant to amuse the reader, but then says, “They stay too long… but the bananas flow,” showing confusion of the monkeys; they want to leave but they need the bananas. Toward the end he says, “One keeper killed my father,” showing his grief. These shifts in tone are meant to signify the change in the writer’s attitude over t...
Although the chosen writer’s style structure is similar in Saint Monkey and “Trilobites,” the writer’s voice and word choice is different. The structure that an author has chosen is important for a author because of the way the story has happened. After reading the biographies of both Breece D’J Pancake and Jacinda Townsend, I realized that even growing up in different parts of the region is different. Both authors’ of Saint Monkey and “Trilobites” grew up in different states and had different lifestyles which has an effect on the writer’s writing
Literary devices are used by Sandra Cisneros throughout the vignette “The Monkey Garden”, to highlight the mood of the piece. For instance, Cisneros uses symbolism to encompass feelings of mysticality when she describes the Monkey Garden as a place the kids can go too “far from where our mothers could find us.”(95). The garden is symbolized as a haven, that can seemingly alleviate the characters problems. Cisneros also uses juxtaposition to further develop mystical emotions the in the audience. When the author compares two objects like “a dollar and a dead mouse.” (95), she is juxtaposing two inherently disconnected objects to emphasise the range of feelings in the garden. By using literary devices to establish the mood, Sandra Cisneros can
Both authors explain the protagonist's first interaction with the calling although, the overall voice is different. Secondly, the use of diction and syntax allows the reader to gain knowledge of emotions due to the connotation and denotation of specific words chosen by each author. In Johnson's narrative, she constantly uses Shakespearean originated words to showcase the protagonist's love and passion for his lover. One is able to acknowledge and perceive the love this character possesses due to the romantic connotation put in place with the following example, “'ll go with thee, thy wife for evermore” (Johnson, 2). As of Bouchard’s narrative, he recognizes the reader which allows one to further explore the legend and obtain a deeper insight due to it being personal, almost as if he was an elder passing down the story rather than reading it. Lastly, figurative language has the ability to exaggerate a point or connects an idea to the reader’s previous knowledge. This results in a more valid compression since it connects one's personal experiences. Johnson follows a continuous rhyme scheme as well as personification and alliteration throughout the poem. It is evident that these literary devices
On December 10, 1950, in Stockholm, Sweden, one of the greatest literary minds of the twentieth century, William Faulkner, presented his acceptance speech for the Nobel Prize. If one reads in between the lines of this acceptance speech, they can detect a certain message – more of a cry or plead – aimed directly to adolescent authors and writers, and that message is to be the voice of your own generation; write about things with true importance. This also means that authors should include heart, soul, spirit, and raw, truthful emotion into their writing. “Love and honor and pity and pride and compassion and sacrifice” (Faulkner) should all be frequently embraced – it is the duty of authors to do so. If these young and adolescent authors ignore this message and duty, the already endangered state of literature will continue to diminish until its unfortunate extinction.
talks to his son. ‘Hark at the wind’, tells us that Mr White is very
In the first paragraph, Johnson displays thoughtfulness of the mother’s feelings, describing the hope she has in him as a “species of happiness” and then gently and gradually disappoints her, saying her hope will result in “disappointment” which is why it is “dangerous to indulge.” However, in the second paragraph an accusatory tone is effectively conveyed by drawing attention to how absurd the mother’s demand is by repeating how the mother wants him to “solicit” the “great” archbishop and ask him to fulfill a favor to a stranger. Johnson employs a sensitive tone in the beginning paragraph followed immediately by a accusatory tone in the second paragraph in order to accommodate various responses to his letter. This shift in tone between paragraphs distances Johnson from the blame of his denial, and gradually places the fault on the
Hansberry, Lorraine. A Raisin in the Sun. Literature and the Writing Process. Elizabeth McMahan, Susan X. Day, and Robert Funk. 6th ed. Upper Saddle River: Prentice, 2002.
In particular, Nemesvari uses Novel on Yellow Paper to explore the way Smith uses language to create interactions between Smith and her audience this “playfulness” Nemesvari names it (26). He goes on to state: “Clearly what Smith desires is the play between illustration and text, but such an interaction immediately subverts the ‘purity,’ the self-sufficiency of poetic language-in-itself” (27). This allows Smith to call attention to the “uncertainties and protean nature of language” (27). Nemesvari uses Smith’s poems as the format of examining her language, including the poem about Casmilus from Novel, which Nemesvari argues tells us how the text should be read. Nemesvari explores Smith’s word choice throughout this poem and other selections in order to encompass ideas of romance, social order, and the limitations of language. He focuses on how Novel forces “the recognition that language and the conventions of fiction are themselves artificial constructs” (30). Smith is aware of the limitations of language, but she is able to utilize it through Pompey by creating a stream of consciousness that allows
Although the greater picture is that reading is fundamental, the two authors have a few different messages that they seek to communicate to their audiences. “The Joy of Reading and Writing” depicts how reading serves as a mechanism to escape the preconceived notions that constrain several groups of people from establishing themselves and achieving success in their lifetimes. “Reading to Write,” on the other hand, offers a valuable advice to aspiring writers. The author suggests that one has to read, read, and read before he or she can become a writer. Moreover, he holds an interesting opinion concerning mediocre writing. He says, “Every book you pick has its own lesson or lessons, and quite often the bad books have more to teach than the good ones” (p.221). Although these two essays differ in their contents and messages, the authors use the same rhetorical mode to write their essays. Both are process analyses, meaning that they develop their main argument and provide justification for it step by step. By employing this technique, the two authors create essays that are thoughtful, well supported, and easy to understand. In addition, Alexie and King both add a little personal touch to their writings as they include personal anecdotes. This has the effect of providing support for their arguments. Although the two essays have fairly different messages, the authors make use of anecdotes and structure their writing in a somewhat similar
How can the thrilling Monkey's Paw story be similar to the petrifying Hitchhiker story? how can they be different ? we can compare and contrast both stories according to various examination ,such as in the writers style in the plot and his/her use of words, techniques used to make suspense , the way they tell the story ,the type of narrator ,and the way they end .
Every author has an identifiable style of writing. Each writes by using specific subjects and features that make his or her novels unique. An example of this is Sara Gruen, who demonstrates characteristic features of her writing in her novel Water for Elephants. The first characteristic that sets Sara Gruen’s novels apart from her colleagues’ is that she tends to write from different perspectives throughout her novels. Water for Elephants displays this feature, as the narrative switches time periods from the main character Jacob’s young adulthood to his old age. Next, uniqueness is constantly seen in Sara Gruen’s novels, including Water for Elephants through her use of sympathy and good versus evil and right versus wrong. Sympathetic behaviour
Glaspell, Susan. Trifles. Literature and the Writing Process. Elizabeth Mahan, Susan X Day, and Robert Funk. 6th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice, 2002. 977-986
Gibbons, Stella. "Imaginative Writing." Light on C.S. Lewis. Ed. Jocelyn Gibb. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World, Inc., 1965. Print.
Reader I must warn you, the following is not a meticulously composed prose by a master of the pen, rather it is the writings and musings of an amateur. In the coming paragraphs I will provide my perspective on reading, writing, literacy and language.
Jones employs the dynamics of change to his speaker throughout the poem. From an aimless vagrant to a passionate revolutionary, Jones plots his speaker's course using specific words and structural techniques. Through these elements, we witness the evolution of a new black man--one who is not content with the passivity of his earlier spiritual leaders. We are left with a threat--a steel fist in a velvet glove of poetry--and it becomes a poem that we "have to" understand, whether we want to or not.