Pleasure And Happiness Essay

1220 Words3 Pages

According to the article entitled Pleasure and Happiness by Aristotle, there are several points of arguments that view by author about the main things in pleasure and happiness. Pleasure and happiness have an own definition and it distinguish by how people measure on itself. Aristotle was among the very greatest thinkers ever and for the term of pleasure and happiness he started come out with the question like what is the good life and how it related with happy life. Every human action aims at some good and the good which, chosen for its own sake and not as means to an end is the highest good. Thus, based on the Nicomachean Ethics, Aristotle set up the term of pleasure comprise produces a definition pleasure.
Based on the article, the review about doctrines of pleasure is Eudoxus held that pleasure was the good because he saw all the things, whether rational or irrational, make pleasure their aim (Randali, Buchler, & Shirk, 1873, p.373). He also argued that in all case that desirable are good and that most desirable is most good. A thing is in the highest degree desirable, if we not want it for any ulterior reason or with any ulterior motive and this is admittedly the case with pleasure. For example it’s about a one thing most great extent of desirable, and if we don’t have a desire for any hidden reason or hidden motive can classify the case with a pleasure. Aristotle detects that people generally agree that happiness is the best life for human beings. It comprises of honor, wealth, and pleasure and true happiness comes from attainment vision and growing into your best likely self.
One major difference is Plato separates pleasure from the good. “He disputes that feel just as much pleasure from his weak acts as the hero can from...

... middle of paper ...

...nd rational, not given to genuine concern for others, nor truly interested in collective existence (Sica, 2005). There are four distinguish able sources from which pleasure and pain are in use to flow and considered separately, they may be termed the physical, the moral the political, and the spiritual. All of this makes the pleasure and pains belonging to each of them are capable of giving a binding force to any law or rule of conduct and they may all of them be termed sanctions.
In conclusion, the value of a lot of pleasure or pain and how to measured it depends on the avoidance of pains are the ends which legislator has in view. Therefore, to understand their value the pleasure and pains are the instruments to tight them work together. According to the Jeremy, if the person considered by himself, the value of a pleasure or pain considered by itself (Sica, 2005).

Open Document