Plato's Letter From Birmingham Jail Summary

1427 Words3 Pages

Plato and King: Crito and a Letter from Birmingham Jail
Making a comparison of Dr. King’s letter from Birmingham with the woks of Plato particularly in the apology is just like comparing two statements regarding moral theory which in most cases do overlap. Each of the two texts makes a discussion of the nature of justice plus the kinds of injustices not forgetting what challenging justice implies. The two pieces of work are in one way or the other, from the political standpoint, that is, in Socrates’ case or in another channel a leader as seen in King’s case who is clearly beset with the political unpopularity. In his work, Socrates says specifically that he has got many foes, who are not only enemies, but those foes of the worst are also …show more content…

In the Crito, Plato gives a number of arguments that are aimed at justifying his opposition towards escaping from jail thus evading the certain death that confronted him despite arguing his sentence as unjust (James, 2013). In the letter from Birmingham, the King is offering a response that is aimed at requesting for a halt of demonstrating also stirring up all forms of civil rights and …show more content…

King insist that all of the laws ought to reflect the societal moral concerns. In this particular letter, he is making that point in the most explicit manner. He touches on sameness and equivocally states that the law is a form that expression of morality. For instance, he says that separation is a sin yet the law encourages it, and that laws itself is not only unjust, but also sinful. Dr. King also makes a number of dissections which bring out the good quality any legal mind must possess. He makes a clear distinction between the letter of a law and the manner in which is enforced, he also makes a distinction most importantly between the just and unjust

Open Document