Debunking Myths: Medieval Warfare Misconceptions

1459 Words3 Pages

The article Popular [Mis]conceptions of Medieval Warfare by Peter Burkholder argues that social stereotypes of medieval warfare result in common misconceptions of what took place during the Middle Ages. Burkholder explains that the entertainment industry perpetuates misconceptions about medieval warfare through inaccurate portrayals in various media. This thesis is further developed in the article through a variety of observations about the correlation between entertainment industries and historical values. The point of the reading is to expose readers to how the entertainment industry misconstrues accounts of medieval warfare by sensationalizing the details of entertainment values. In the article Crusading Warfare and Its Adaptation to Eastern …show more content…

This article uses the technique of scholarly questions and answers to help readers understand the context of the article. One question raised in relation to the primary source the song of Roland is, “But are such pieces of literature – medieval though they are- reliable for their military history’? This question is asked after examining the primary source. The question asked was then explained by recalling “basic methodology pertaining to the primary source”. By the article raising questions it allows the reader to think deeper into the topic by allowing them to relate prior knowledge to what is being asked, making a correlation between given information, and prior understanding of the topic. Burkholder’s also uses primary sources, which could help develop a research paper. The use of primary sources in the article strengthens the author’s arguments. Some primary sources used are the song of Roland, Paul Davis’s 100 Decisive Battles, and De Re Militari. For each primary source Burkholder breaks down particular quotes and makes arguments with relevance to the thesis. This helps readers to check the reliability of the article, and use the primary sources to better understand how the information relates to the over all thesis. Additionally, the author cites with using primary sources specific movies such as King Authur (2004) and Lord Of The Rings: The Two Towers (2002), deconstructing how the two films relate directly to history and how accurate specific scenes in the movie are. One interesting technique used by the author is a critical analysis of how the entertainment industry is beneficial for history, and how it’s non-beneficial. In one interesting example Burkhodler provide three compelling reasons to illustrate how films are beneficial to an accurate appreciation of historical events. These points of view

Open Document