Persuasive Essay: Pitbulls Should Be Banned

1846 Words4 Pages

Many households in America own a beloved pet, known as man’s best friend. Dogs are a cherished member of the family. They aid as a best friend and good companion whenever we are in a moment of sadness or joy. However, imagine someone forcing you to remove a pet from the family just because it falls into the “dangerous” breeds list. This is the type of situation inflicted on many people as a result of breed specific banning. They target groups of animals who are viewed as a big threat to the public. What if your pet was loving, kind, and gentle but fell into the banned breeds list? No one would be able to resist this change without having to pay excessive amounts of money for restraints, just in case another attack would occur. Pit bulls, especially, …show more content…

While there have been numerous attacks and deaths against humans, banning an entire breed is not the solution or justified because breed-specific bans do not eliminate the problem, it is not solely the fault of a dog that it becomes aggressive, and they were once an American favorite in the past. The negative effects that breed specific bans impose blind many people.
It is easy to forget that Pit bulls did not always have such a bad history and were once an American favorite. "Far from being considered a killing machine on legs, pit bulls seem to be an American favorite in the early half of the century — indeed, during World War I, the country itself is personified as a pit bull on army recruitment posters, and several pit bulls go on to become famous in the American military” (Bastian). People do not realize that they were a beloved breed and did not have such a horrible reputation for causing fatalities. It is not impossible to train this breed to become obedient and gentle towards humans. However, for this to happen, it starts with the reasons why this once loving breed, turned so violent. Not all the blame that is unleashed solely on the dog can continue because they turn into what their owners create. The way we view Pit bulls and other …show more content…

Blaming them on their actions, which they cannot control, will never solve the problem. Banning an entire breed where many have not done anything wrong will not improve anything either. A huge factor is Breed-specific laws have many flaws that people are unaware of. These laws result in, “dogs going into hiding, good owners and dogs being punished, imparting a false sense of security, and may actually encourage ownership by irresponsible people” (The American Society for the prevention of cruelty to animals). This shows a less than proactive approach to the situation because it represents very negative results to the problem. It forces innocent dogs and owners into an uncomfortable situation that could be avoided by focusing on a better solution. This results in not getting proper care from the vet, pulls attention away from other laws that can make a bigger difference, and can tempt irresponsible dog owners to engage in illegal activities because it goes against the rules (The American Society for the prevention of cruelty to animals). Breed specific bans generate inconvenience for people and dogs who are innocent and do not break any laws. It is not fair to punish everyone as a whole because of the reckless actions of others. Many people have committed unthinkable crimes and murders, however, humans are not all bad. It would not be fair to label the human race as selfish and

Open Document