Persuasive Essay On Capital Punishment

810 Words2 Pages

Capital Punishment
Does the federal government deserve to determine who gets the death penalty? It is debatable whether or not capital punishment should be expunged. Sending someone to the death, it is an important and serious decision to make. Capital punishment is cruel and unusual punishment. The thought of taking someone’s life is unjustified. Is capital punishment, even beneficial for our society? Capital punishment should be abolished because people can change, their other forms of punishment, and every person has the right to live, regardless of what they have done.
First, “A Death in Texas” by Steve Earle shows evidence that people can change. “A Death in Texas is about the death row prisoner, Jonathan Nobles, and Earle’s relationship …show more content…

Furthermore, Earle states, “ There he will be pumped full of chemicals that will collapse his lungs and stop his heart forever.” (74) Jon will face a cruel and inhumane death. He spent 12 years in prison before he was even executed. It is debatable whether or not Jon was getting the proper representation to defend his side of the story. If he cannot afford to get a good attorney , he may have not gotten a fair deal. Earle also goes on to say, “ The supposedly “non-violent” lethal injection process literally destroys the lungs and renders all other organs too toxic for transplantation” (74) No human should have the right to kill another person. His death will be so crucial, that he will not have the opportunity to help others by giving them an organ transplant. The government is taking one life away and possibly another. This “non-violent” (74) injection will not only destroy his lungs, but the entire inside of his body. To give a man capital punishment who has killed someone it is continuing the cycle of violence. This is not teaching society to take personal responsibility for their actions. Everyone needs to live with the things that they have done no matter the

Open Document