Persuasive Essay On Breed Specific Law

822 Words2 Pages

Dogs are loyal, loving, and caring animals regardless of their size, shape or breed. There is no such thing as a bad dog by nature because of the breed. The problem is bad dog owners. Therefore, small dogs can be a risk too; and breed-specific laws are ineffective because BSL is targeting dogs instead of owners. Why kill innocent dogs because of their breeds? We designed those dogs. Those various “dangerous” breeds are a result of selective breeding for various physical and behavioral traits. Every dog was designed for a purpose. Pit bull’s purpose is to combine the gameness and agility of the terrier with the strength of the bulldog. German Shepherds were bred to be working animals and herding dogs. Therefore, instead of killing innocent dogs, …show more content…

However, Breed Specific Laws are not the right way to go. Breed Specific Laws target the dogs and not the bad owners. These laws are tough and expensive to enforce and not just that, but they are also INEFFECTIVE. The dog reflects the human and becomes what the human makes it. We blame the dogs when they end up a problem in the house. Eventually, “there is enough bad press and problems because of a very small minority of dog owners and the result is more often a call for a restriction of the breed. Instead, the restriction needs to be placed on the owners who create the real danger.” (Wood) People who are looking to adopt or shop must be educated by either taking a short inexpensive course “How to be the pack leader” or “How to interact with your dog”. This will lead to more erudite owners and safer interactions between humans and dogs. Leash laws are also a great way to discourage dogs’ inappropriate behaviors. Owners are responsible to contain their dogs. Always hold erudite owners accountable. The government should strengthen and enforce penalties for irresponsible careless dog owners, as well as, discourage dog fighting and animal

Open Document