Personalisation within Adult Social Work Mental health, friend or foe?

899 Words2 Pages

In this essay, I would like to explore a limited number of key concepts within Adult Social Work, pertaining to Mental Health Services and their users. Unfortunately, due to the certain word count restrictions imposed, and the complexity of the subject, I have decided to critically analyse a complex and divisive policy within mental health social work. I am predominantly concerned with the impact the personalised care approach has on those involved with the social work. I am going to discuss the theory surrounding it, the circumstances in which it was received and comprehended by the professionals and lay people alike in order to facilitate a better understanding of the subject at hand. Having an understanding of the process of application, the carers and service users’ perception as well as the challenges this concept has brought within the Social care system opens the mind to questioning the base value supporting Personalisation. It is important to remember that the idea of personalisation is not revolutionary, it has always been in the minds of idealists as an aspiration. I would like to propose the idea of dynamicity of the views and attitudes towards the social care, greatly dependable on the economic status (funding), culture, and awareness leading to a greater understanding of the issues many people are struggling with throughout their lives, i.e. Disability, mental health problems, abuse, and homelessness. The historical care approach applied in mental health used to be paternalistically authoritarian, and heavily based on a medical approach regarding illness and treatments. For instance, in the 1948, following the introduction of the welfare state, which became the starting point of the journey towards personalisation... ... middle of paper ... ...e service users, for instance from a supportive role to a safeguarding role. Paul Burstow, Minister of State for Care Services is trying to introduce the idea of the state as an enabling partner rather than a paternalistic authoritarian symbol of power. This is an important aspect of the personalisation, it should not entail only financial freedom from the state in the context of independent care budgets, and it should become apparent within the attitude towards service users. Leadbeater’s understanding of personalisation is astounding, he proposes subtly the application of the Nordic Model which will be discussed later on. “. . . putting users at the heart of services, enabling them to become participants in the design and delivery, services will be more effective by mobilising millions of people as co-producers of the public goods they value.” Leadbeater (2004)

Open Document