Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Professional scepticism importance
The importance of maintaining professional scepticism
The importance of maintaining professional scepticism
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Professional scepticism importance
1- There are many challenges in current audit environment from reading of PCAB 2013 public report, and three challenges are
• Globalization:
The need for expansion in global business is a necessity for big companies, and many Canadian companies are expanding their operation into overseas markets. This is a new challenge to the performance of high quality auditing, because new transaction will be made in these markets which are not necessarily follow Canadian GAAP standards for purpose of reporting. The auditors must ensure they understand business standards and regulatory that is applicable to entities that now form a part of consolidated financial statement. The auditors need to understand business structures which exist in foreign countries.
…show more content…
This will make it more challenging to ensure the accuracy of consolidated financial statement and disclosure of notes in the financial statement.
Summary results of the big four results from inspection
• Lack of professional skepticism
It is not a good practice for auditor to just accept management’s views without any arguments or appropriate challenges. Auditors should always challenge management for what they tell them against what they already have.
CPAB believes firms need to enhance the professional skepticism of their staff by:-
Senior members of engagement team are rotated frequently to avoid complacency or threat of familiarity.
Increase the visibility and effectiveness of senior engagement team members during all audits.
Engagement team to be less accepting and more challenging in their approach to an audit.
Training of professionals in exercising skepticism.
• Audit work of internal controls
It is important to test internal controls, in many cases audit fails due to lack of identifying the key control that must be tested by engagement team. Also the audit fails if wrong control was
…show more content…
Firms need to make sure they have sufficient access to working papers of component auditors. Also they need to have adequate knowledge of the customs and business practices in foreign countries.
• Impairment testing
Firms must always audit fair value for the purpose of determining possible impairment of assets. This is determined by analyzing cash flow.
CPAB Has noticed that firms do not sufficiently analyze if these projections are based on reasonable assumption.
• Reliance of internal controls
Firms must not rely on internal controls when they have smaller reporting issues. When assessing effectiveness internal controls firms usually fail to identify and test controls that mitigate audit risk at assertion level.
2- 3 current and emerging issues
• Changes to auditor reporting
CPAB believes that more transparency with auditor reporting is needed. Auditors need to share information in order to provide bigger value to their audit of financial statement.
Listed below are areas that need improvement:
1- Key/Critical audit
Even though internal controls do not always work, every entity that has workers should have internal controls. Internal controls protect entities from dishonest workers. Internal controls are a series of checks and balances. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 was needed to gain control of accounting improprieties. Dishonest accounting has cost company employees millions of dollars in retirement funds. It has also cost investors millions of dollars.
The auditors will also ask about warehouse locations, volume, types of inventories, and any high value items. Auditors will also review working papers by internal auditors, if appropriate, and working papers by prior external auditors to identify high risk areas and areas that require special attention. We will train ourselves with the environment of inventory and deliberate the need for professionals to verify some special items, such as electronic devices.
In order to ensure an organization’s financial order, auditors with international standards are a vital part. However, very few auditing companies exist in Afghanistan that can provide auditing services in compliance with international accounting standards. Fortunately, ACC is one of those few auditing firms that can confidently say that its auditing services are in the highe...
Based on the evidence, they failed to meet the accrual recognition requirements, in addition to the following:
Krishan, G.V., & Wei, Y. (2012). Do small firms benefit from auditor attestation of internal control effectiveness? Auditing, 31(4), 115-137. doi:10.2308/ajpt-50238
Detection risk is directly related to the risk of material misstatements. The higher the likelihood the financial statements are materially misstated, the lower the detection risk is. With the lower detection risk, it is less vital to scrutinize the financial statements. All auditors should perform due diligence when assessing these risks and adhere to the proper procedures used to conduct the audit.
If there is any risk of management override, the auditor is required to exam the journal entries, check accounting estimates for biases that cause of fraud, and evaluate the significant transactions which is not in the regular business
I selected to discuss the employee engagement process intervention method. According to Kahn (1990), employee engagement is when organizational members utilize their emotional, cognitive, and physical means in order to perform their duties (as cited in Xu & Thomas, 2011). The purpose of using the employee engagement process intervention method is to convert the culture in management from one that is traditional to one that has shared responsibilities, collaborative, and team focused (Holman, Devane, & Cady, 2007). Furthermore, the purpose of this intervention method is to achieve an environment with open communication, and individual accountability of the culture (Holman et al., 2007).
An auditor needs to follow, abide and comply with the standards, rules and regulations of their profession, as these will help the auditor to recognize when independence and objectivity are compromised. Works Cited Gray, Iain and Stuart Manson. The Audit Process: Principles, Practice and Cases. London: Thomson Learning, 2008. Print.
The oversight responsibilities of the board, the CAE lacking of expertise or broad understanding of financial controls and responsibilities, and the understaffed internal audit functions lacking of independence and direct access to the board of directors contributed to the absence of internal controls. To begin with, the board should be retrained to achieve financial literacy to review financial reporting. Other than attending formal meetings, the board of directors should be more involved with the management. For the Audit Committee, the two members who were recruited as acquaintances to Brennahan need be replaced with experts who are more sufficiently knowledgeable about accounting rules beyond merely “financially literate”. Furthermore, the internal audit functions need to expand with different expertise commensurate with the expanded activities of the organization, testing financial reporting rather than internal controls from an operational perspective. The CAE should be more independent and proactive to execute audit plans, instead of following orders from the CFO, and initiate a direct and efficient communication between internal audit and audit
Next to the creation of independence rules, regulators have tried alternative remedies to preserve the independence of auditors by implementing mandatory audit partner rotation and increased the audit committees’ responsibilities, independence, and expertise (Fiolleau, Hoang, Jamal, & Sunder, 2013). The independence rules are created by regulatory bodies (e.g. the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB)) and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and serve two public
The fundamental duty of an external financial auditor is to form and express an opinion on whether the reporting entity’s financial statements are prepared in accordance with the relevant financial reporting framework. In discharging this duty, the auditor must exercise “reasonable skill, care and caution” (Lopes, J. in Kingston Cotton Mill Co 1896) as reflected in current legal and professional requirements.
Auditing has been the backbone of the complicated business world and has always changed with the times. As the business world grew strong, auditors’ roles grew more important. The auditors’ job became more difficult as the accounting principles changed. It also became easier with the use of internal controls, which introduced the need for testing, not a complete audit. Scandals and stock market crashes made auditors aware of deficiencies in auditing, and the auditing community was always quick to fix those deficiencies. Computers played an important role of changing the way audits were performed and also brought along some difficulties.
Overall, the company is having ineffective controls regarding different departments and in the whole organization. An effective internal audit department should be established within the organization which should test the effectiveness of these controls on regular basis and make it sure that all controls are working effectively and efficiently with the different departments of the organization. Also the Internal auditor should implement the most effective processes and measures to prevent and detect the fraud, corruption and non compliance with the laws and regulations in the organization. Establishment of internal audit committee would be helpful in this regard which comprises of executive and non executive directors.
Audit is a process to evaluate and review the accounts and financial statement objectively. We can divide it into internal auditors and external auditors. Internal auditors have a inner knowledge of business process. Auditor has access to the much confidential information and all levels of management. But they may lose their judgement and they are not acceptable by the shareholder. “The overall objective of the external auditors is to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements as a whole are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to report on the financial statements in acco...