More handpicked essays just for you.
Negative impacts that social media has
Negative impacts that social media has
Negative consequences of social media
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Negative impacts that social media has
This past Monday, the United States Supreme Court took a step back in it’s decision involving
the case of Packingham v. North Carolina. The Court made a bad ruling in favor of letting
registered sex offenders to access social media. Which means that these offenders will now be
able to communicate with different people online. To Buckingham's credit, the one representing
this community was a person who has been living his life cleanly since committing his crime
many years ago. But this issue isn’t just about him, think about this for a moment, the doors are
now open for predators with bad intentions to increase this danger and target innocent lives. One
can almost be certain that these people think they are communicating with genuine
In the controversial court case, McCulloch v. Maryland, Chief Justice John Marshall’s verdict gave Congress the implied powers to carry out any laws they deemed to be “necessary and proper” to the state of the Union. In this 1819 court case, the state of Maryland tried to sue James McCulloch, a cashier at the Second Bank of the United States, for opening a branch in Baltimore. McCulloch refused to pay the tax and therefore the issue was brought before the courts; the decision would therefore change the way Americans viewed the Constitution to this day.
.... Madison was applied to this decision because the actions committed were unconstitutional. According to the Supreme Court the 8th Amendment was broken because the District Court of Appeal was giving a cruel and unusual punishment to Graham. The 8th amendment claus does not allow a juvenile offender to be sentenced to life in jail without a parole for a non-homicidal crime. Therefore Terrance could not fall through with this punishment.
middle of paper ... ... It was just that the Supreme Court believed that this specific case was unconstitutional. The one thing that I find very interesting is that if the Line Item Veto was found unconstitutional in this case then why is it that the president in the past terms has been able to use the Line Item Veto? This type of veto is still around today, and is still used.
McCulloch v Maryland 4 Wheat. (17 U.S.) 316 (1819) Issue May Congress charter a bank even though it is not an expressly granted power? Holding Yes, Congress may charter a bank as an implied power under the “necessary and proper” clause. Rationale The Constitution was created to correct the weaknesses of the Articles. The word “expressly” particularly caused major problems and therefore was omitted from the Constitution, because if everything in the Constitution had to be expressly stated it would weaken the power of the Federal government.
The Plessy v Ferguson case was an example that there was still discrimination in America. In 1890, Louisiana passed a law called the Separate Car Act that says all railroad
In the case Bumper v. North Carolina, Wayne Darnell Bumper was charged and arrested on charges of rape and assault on a child. While the police officers were investigating the case they searched Mrs. Hattie Leath- Bumper’s grandmother‘s home- where he was living at the time. Mrs. Leath consented the police to search her home after the officers said they had a warrant, which they did not have. The officers found a rifle in the kitchen and proceeded to take the gun in as evidence. The rifle was then introduced into Bumper’s trial as evidence. The trial court allowed the gun to be entered in as evidence because Leath gave consent to the officers to search her home.
It is estimated that approximately 3% of the offenders who are currently incarcerated will likely commit another sexual-related crime upon release (Park & Lee, 2013, p. 26). There are several laws that have been in place regarding sexual offenses for decades, including Megan’s Law, which was enacted in 1996. The federal Megan’s Law establishes three specific conditions. The first condition required information from state sex offender registries to be distributed publicly so that all community citizens have access to it. The second condition requires any information collected by registration programs within the state to be released for any reason given that it is allowed under the state law.
We have all watched television shows, we have heard the warnings, and have read numerous articles that expose internet predators and pedophiles. Most of us are aware of the dangers surrounding children and teenagers as they navigate the internet’s virtual world. There is no shortage of predators online. Chris Hanson has a very popular show called To Catch a Predator that has helped bring awareness to the public of this heinous crime against children, and while this is extremely important to know and prevent, there is another large segment of society that is at risk too. This paper will focus on this “other” population.
Sex offender legislation has been encouraged and written to protect the community and the people at large against recidivism and or to help with the reintegration of those released from prison. Nevertheless, a big question has occurred as to if the tough laws created help the community especially to prevent recidivism or make the situation even worse than it already is. Sex offenders are categorized into three levels for example in the case of the state of Massachusetts; in level one the person is not considered dangerous, and chances of him repeating a sexual offense are low thus his details are not made available to the public (Robbers, 2009). In level two chances of reoccurrence are average thus public have access to this level offenders through local police departments in level three risk of reoffense is high, and a substantial public safety interest is served to protect the public from such individuals.
The Tennessee v. Garner case impacted law enforcement agencies today by utilizing the Fourth Amendment right of not using deadly force to prevent a suspect from fleeing unless the officer is in imminent danger of their life. Consequently, before this was set into place, an officer had the right to use deadly force on a fleeing suspect by all means.” The first time the Court dealt with the use of force was in Tennessee v. Garner, in Garner, a police officer used deadly force despite being "reasonably sure" that the suspect was an unarmed teenager "of slight build" who was running away from him” (Gross,2016). Whereas, with Graham v. Conner case was surrounded around excessive force which also has an impact on law enforcement agencies in today’s society as well. “All claims that law enforcement officers have used excessive force deadly or not in the course of an arrest, investigatory stop, or other “seizure” of s free citizen should be analyzed under the Fourth Amendment and its “reasonableness” standard” (Doerner,2016).
of Sex Offenders Via the Internet. The John Marshal Journal of Computer and Information Law
The sex offenders are creating major health and psychological effects on the victims. It is also changing the perspective people have of internet safety. Having sex offenders or other cyber-crime be compelled by persuading the government to take action. This article and "From a Public Internet to the Internet Mall" written by Parminder Jeet Singh has a different viewpoint because it does not give the government an exception why it will undergo regulating to a better extent. Relating this article to “Internet Use and Psychological Well-Being: Effects of Activity and Audience” by the emotion that we must be aware of our actions when utilizing the internet. Incorporating the internet into our daily lives to be compelled to be more responsible of what choices will
Young lives are being exploited by predators online, mostly because the internet permits one to be anonymous. While the internet is a great tool for children to use for homework assignments, expand on their personal interests and socialize with friends, it also poses tremendous threats to them. In the article, MySpace Not Responsible for Predator, a 14-year-old child met with a 19-year-old man who allegedly raped her. The rapist had used an alias to lie about his age to get her attention. This is an example of an unfortunate incident where a child became the victim of a predator. A monster robbed a young girl from her childhood’s innocence in moments; a time where she should have been worried-free of such repulsive crimes.
Generally, social networking provides online sexual predators with an easy gateway to youths. Users of online social media services tend to share copious amounts of personal information on online profiles, these same users control who can or cannot see their information by utilizing privacy settings. The problem with these “privacy settings” is that they are often hard to manipulate, leaving a multitude of online profiles vulnerable to often explicit offers from online sexual predators. Lacking the ability to protect their information properly, users are in jeopardy of being contacted by sexual predators. In fact, “[d]uring the years prior to the explosive expansion of social networks, most online sexual predators attempted to contact youths through chat rooms and message boards. In recent years, however, predators are increasingly targeting minors over social networking services”, showing that social networking directly puts youths in peril (Guo, 626). This sheds light on the fact that social networking is basically a way to herd youths and display them ...
Although the stereotypical predator is a middle aged man, any given stranger on the internet can be a predator. In modern society, social media provides an environment where predators can disguise themselves amongst potential or current friends to bait in their targets. In 2010, The Journal of Adolescent Health conducted a study revealing that “33% of all Internet-initiated sex crimes involved social networking sites.” It is shocking to learn that a third of all sex crime is initiated on social media considering all the measures users can apply to prevent the crimes. Social media users have the ability to control who can and cannot communicate with them via privacy settings. Even in the instance that users come into contact with a stranger, they can still use good judgment to determine if the stranger is a risk or another harmless user. I believe the amount of sexual crime committed on social media can easily be reduced if the proper precautions are