P2p Case Study

736 Words2 Pages

2.What should peer-to-peer (P2P) networks do to grow their business? P2P providers should look for new ways to legalize file-sharing. P2P companies should convince the music industry by presenting feasible solutions that economically can benefit the music industry, like charging users fees to access files. Placing a system to assist file-sharing users to open retail accounts, whereas retailers allow other P2P fans to download songs for small fees, then a percentage of this money is handed in to copyright owners. Applying a filtering system to prevent sharing the music that is a subject to copyright law. Offering the music labels flat fees to get music licences.
3.Could the various protagonists have 'seen it coming '? Were there any warning signs that might have helped them to respond? Music sharing is not new to the music industry. It has increased significantly since the advent of the cassette. This may have formed a strong sign that there were a major change coming in the music industry. The advances in computer technology and internet were …show more content…

The world music industry revenue is cut by 50% in the last 20 years, respecting to piracy, illegal file sharing, legal download such as iTunes service and streaming services (McDoling , 2015). Generally, the internet might be the biggest problem to the music industry ,if the music business didn 't know how to deal with it. P2P is a part of the issue, since it has caused a high drop in music sale. However, it sounds that the music industry has been gaining a big victory in US over file-sharing. By comparing the number of the targeted IP address accounts lawsuits 43,124 ISP in 2010 to the 6700 IP in 2015, we conclude a remarkable decrease in music piracy (A, 2016). The current cooperation among the music industry and the new music streaming services (Spotify) which allow a legal cheap access to copyright musics announces a new music business

Open Document