Our Secret Susan Griffin Analysis

1364 Words3 Pages

The topic of whether it is in the nature of living beings to be naturally good has been examined by several authors throughout previous centuries, for example, Susan Griffin. Using a humanistic perspective, Griffin’s chapter, “Our Secret”, from her book, A Chorus of Stones, approaches this topic and can reflect on her own life and feelings using other people’s stories about fears and their secrets. Combining her personal life stories, Himmler’s life narrative, as well as two sub stories, Griffin’s chapter allows characters to represent human emotions and emphasize the hidden feelings of living beings. Similarly, Plato’s dialogue, Phaedrus, and Franz de Waal’s, The Ape and the Sushi Master, talk about the topic of living beings being naturally …show more content…

At the beginning of the chapter, the second italicized lines of one of the sub stories include the creation of a V-1 rocket that is used as a deadly weapon although previously, the materials were not harmful (Griffin 36). The sub stories serve as a comparison between a machine and the characters, and a way to further explain the evolution of Himmler and Griffin while growing up. For example, it is stated that, “The missile is guided by a programmed mechanism… once it is fired it cannot stop,” which serves as a comparison to Himmler because he was raised with a certain discipline that did not allow him to be himself, instead he became someone deadly, as the weapon (Griffin 37). Griffin uses an image of a baby to illustrate that everyone is born with no negative intentions, however, it is while being raised and being forced to be someone different that the intentions begin taking either the good or evil side (41). This idea of good and evil is illustrated in Plato’s, Phaedrus, when he mentions the concept of the two horses and the charioteer. In this concept, one of the horses is evil, while the other horse is good, and the charioteer must balance both horses under his control, just like Himmler had to choose either to become good or evil (Plato 74). Both Griffin and Plato mention that as living beings, we have the right to choose whether our intentions should be good and evil, and it is up to decide what we

Open Document