Oppression In The Handmaid's Tale

434 Words1 Page

Throughout her novel, The Handmaid’s Tale, Margret Atwood repeatedly draws attention to the problems that women have suffered. The Handmaids tale is a dystopia based on a patriarchal theocracy. One central theme of the novel is the abuse and oppression of women. As the title suggest, the story centers around, Offred, a handmaid in the republic of Gilead. Which brings me to the first little hint of oppression. Most women in the novel lost a since of self-identity due to the fact that they were no longer allowed to be called by their birth name. “Offred” Literally means of Fred. Fred being her commander. As the reader, we never find out what Offred’s real name was. Furthermore, women were seen merely as property. Due to low birth rates and infertility of the time in which the story was based, handmaids specifically were property used to bear children with. Offred says, we are two-legged wombs, that’s all: …show more content…

They do not call it rape because technically one chooses to be a handmaid. I say technically because handmaids had one of three options. Option one was to become a handmaid. Option two was Death. Option three was to be sent to the colonies which one was unlikely to survive. In this passage, Offered recalls the night of the ceremony, “nor does rape cover it: nothing is going on here that I haven’t signed up for (Page 94).” Offred justifies the abuse she went through with the notion that she chose that path. However, Offred simply chose to survive. In fact Margret Atwood frames the novel with an epigraph that reads, “In the desert there is no sign that says, Thou shalt not eat stones." Meaning one does what the need to do to survive. Anyway, the only hope to get out of this

Open Document