On The Horns Of A Dilemma Analysis

838 Words2 Pages

Adam Isaiah Green tackles homophobia, black religion, and the socialization of black, gay men and how that encourages them to pursue sexual careers in “On the Horns of A Dilemma: Institutional Dimensions of the Sexual Career in a Sample of Middle Class, Urban, Black, Gay Men”. Green divides the study into three sections: “Black Gay Youth Pushed To The Margins of Black Communities”, “Black Homosexual Men Pulled Into Urban Gay Centers”, and “The Institutional Basis of Black Homosexual Careers”. Dr. Green is an Associate Professor in the Department of Sociology at University of Toronto. He earned his M.A and Ph.D at New York University and was a postdoctoral fellow at Indiana University. Much of his research analyzes the intersectionalities of …show more content…

He calls this article “an exploratory study” and recruits 30 self identified gay, black men in Manhattan between the ages of 21 and 40. Green conducted interviews that lasted an average of three hours and each interview was audio recorded then later transcribed. His recruitment of these men were through a“grapevine” technique, asking men from different bar, churches, and gyms in Manhattan. This style of recruitment could have been better facilitated by distributing interest forms to local bars, gay organizations, etc in Manhattan. The personal interaction with each interviewer raises skepticism about the level of professionalism of Green’s study. Green also states that each participant worked in their own unique, “sexual career” that was starkly distinctive from each of the men interviewed. He never explains what a “sexual career” is, how the men define their careers, and how their identities as “middle class, urban, black gay men” relate to their …show more content…

ion. “For many if not most future homosexual adults, their childhood families are organized around compulsory heterosexuality, rendering homosexuality invisible or taboo.” Green makes several statements similar to this when he could have provided any evidence or statistical data reinforcing his findings. This section of the study is structured more like a short biography of each participant. This weakens the study and suggests a personal connection not only between Green and each participant, but also between each participant and the readers of Green’s study. Conveying the stories of these black, gay men’s lives to emote stories of desperation and a lack of perseverance is a subtle form of exploitation that Green clearly did not realize when he was conducting these interviews. Green does not realize this because his identity as a white, gay man is privileged with not having to have his story be one that is compared to other white, gay men and used as a standard for which all other stories as considered related to. Within the gay community, the white, gay man is shielded with the being the face for movement for all LGBTQ people and being represented more in mainstream media (television shows, movies, pornography). Without accusing Green, fetishisizing black, gay men is an inexcusable proclivity within the gay community especially within urban areas

Open Document