Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Alzheimer's disease diagnosis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Alzheimer's disease diagnosis
TED CRITIQUE #1: Doherty, Olivia I think that the topic Olivia chose was very interesting because in her attention getter she listed some fun facts about this disease and that there is no cure. Olivia’s topic was appropriately leveled. I think that her content was just right. This disease is very complicated because there is no cure but I like how she described the disease and how it is similar to dementia. If I was listening to her talk and had no idea what Alzheimer’s was, at the end of her TED talk I would have had a good general idea of what this disease is. Her talk was very well organized. I like how she started with the disease and what it was then moved into the research and then ended with recommendations and what she believes. Her …show more content…
I thought it was very well organized. Her example of the Thanksgiving meal was very helpful to realize how obesity can happen and how it is impacted by our pleasure center. Meg’s description on how these drugs are different than pervious anti-obesity meds was very helpful and encouraging because like she said they are always getting pulled off the shelf shortly after being marketed. Her writing of the drugs up on the top were helpful specifically for seeing how the drugs were spelt. Meg was very confident when giving her presentation. Her changes in her voice were helpful to know her key points she wanted us to get and when she found something fascinating. One thing she can work on is her hands were a little distracting at times because they were moving very often. Also, it was a little distracting how she was in the same paragraph but she would transition from different …show more content…
Leah’s TED talk was academically appropriate. The specific drug and its mechanisms were very complicated but Leah did a wonderful job describing how they work on a simpler level. Before her TED talk I really didn’t know much about Duchene Muscular Dystrophy (DMD). Her history of what this is and what the signs and symptoms of DMD are were very helpful to gain a better understanding of her topic. I didn’t know drugs were able to go on the fast track through the FDA process. I liked how she described the reasons why this drug was approved for the fast track and why some people opposed this approval. Leah had enough content and a wide variety of information. Her visuals were very helpful and enhanced her talk. I really like the Gower maneuverer picture because I have never seen someone stand up like this which is the common sign of this disease. She didn’t use her hands much for nonverbal mannerisms but I thought that it was helpful she didn’t move them because they can be distracting at times. She gave the talk confidently and I liked how she shared the hopes for this drugs
“Straining his eyes, he saw the lean figure of General Zaroff. Then... everything went dark. Maggie woke up in her bed. “Finally woke up from that nightmare. Man… I miss my brother. Who was that person that my brother wanted to kill?” she looks at the clock and its 9:15am “Crap I’m late for work!” Maggie got in her car and drove to the hospital for work.
I am the wife of an innocent dead man. I raised three without a father. People see us as less. We are the Robinson, and me I’m Helen Robinson. Living in the deep south in the 1930’s wineries. The Depression affected most everyone in Maycomb except for us. All of the blacks in the county live in one area outside of the landfill. I lived on the edge of farm which grows acres of cotton every year. We were a poor family that sharecropped. There weren't many people in Maycomb who treated us kindly except for Mr. Link Deas and the Finches. One year the white trash family accused my Tom for a serious crime that he never did. For months we never saw him due to the polices never let blacks and women in. The Finches and neighbours came and helped during
Although it was not the best, she got the attention she wanted from the audience. She would soon serve an important role for the whole country and they already were interested in what she had to say. She maintained constant eye contact with her audience and at times looked down at her outline to keep herself on track and possibly to stay in the time frame she was given. Her voice was strong at times though it seemed the strong emotions she had at the moment interfered with the delivery of the speech. She would sometimes lose her breath and at other times she would talk extremely slow both which distracted from what she was saying. She showed much enthusiasm about her nomination stating how humbled she felt for being considered. Lastly, while Sotomayor did get her message across she sometimes sounded monotone and she moved little. When she was giving her speech she hardly moved and she sounded and looked almost like a robot, however her job did not entitle giving speeches rather it consisted of making decision and standing by them which is the domineer she
So what can go wrong with a long so strong, a hold you so tight, a night so calm
She then immediately follows up with a way to fix it and demand respect. Shes trying to connect with the audience and shows that she has been in the same place, that she can relate. You can see that she has done her research, she uses plenty of statistics to give you a visual of what she is talking about as well as quoting people from organizations and giving them the appropriate credit. She mentions in 2005 at yale, her alma mater, 15 students sat in the admissions office until they were removed by police. These individuals were demanding changes to the financial aid policy.
My thoughts on whose Susan Cain’s speech she was humorous, seemed sympathetic, and trustworthy. I believed and visualized her thoughts on being an introvert. She sounded passionate but not overdoing it, more subtle in a
I also felt that the way she was able to back up some of her claims with quotes from prominent philosophers shows how much she cares about this concept and the lengths that she will go to in order to truly find the formula for
I could understand everything perfectly as she did her introduction. I could tell she was nervous because she stumbled upon a few words but she took her time and spoke very calmly and had great pronunciation and barely looked at the index cards in her hands. She had a smile on her face the whole time she was doing her presentation. She didn’t take full credit, she stated her citation of where she got the ingredience from. She talked about herself and her love for baking and how she thought her audience would benefit from her video.
What caught my attention in her speech was the different form of speech that I’m not used to by rhyming the suffixes instead of giving an expected style of speech. She seems to know her speech exceptionally well by not stumbling over words or miss any words, which if she did it would have made the speech confusing my messing up the pattern that she established. Her tone is broader than Waldinger’s speech maybe because she is in a more inclosed space which may have an effect, but is not in question that she gets her point across. She also talks in a more rapidly, uptempo style than Waldinger
Her feelings of compassion and pity would have made me feel better about myself. Today I agree more with Udovitch. She is anti-pro-ana and tells the story how it needs to be told. Eating disorders are dangerous and they need to be addressed by someone.
She used humor occasionally but it wasn't usually relevant to the actual speech. There was no use of visual aids which was fine because it did not really require any. Moving on, she discussed the things that have worked for her like making schedules and being persistent. In doing so, she related it back on how one could use her examples in order to become more efficient. She used many hand gestures which helped us concentrate on her message more effectively.
What made Amy Cuddy speech so effective was her delivery to the audience during her TED Talk. Amy was very articulate with her verbal projection because she never stumble on words or took long pauses in between her connections of ideas on the topics. Also, the viewer or an audience member could tell that Cuddy took time to
I was interested in the debate over her taking medication. I, at first agreed with her and her parents about not wanting her on medication. I was also worried about her uniqueness and creativity being destroyed by the medication. I also was excited by the idea of her changing schools in hope that she would make friends. I did not think about the new school working as a substitute stimulus for her. I was very surprised to learn about her lying about her academics and saddened to learn about her social problems. I was surprised at how much the medication helped her in the end and glad it did not hurt her uniqueness.
She moved with a passion and intensity that was not reflected in her face. As Macaulay stated, "you watch in the hope of understanding her better" (Citation). Although the movement was compelling, her blank expression made it difficult for the audience to connect with her. Instead of watching her movement, I was preoccupied in understanding what was driving her. However, her empty expression was suitable for the sections that included props and enabled me to focus on the intricacies of those
The management team from Adam’s place reminded me that we are not only responsible for the patient, but we are also obligated to help the patient’s family. Listening to them explain why it’s important to consider every aspect of the emotional and physical damage patients may suffer from was very eye opening. Mackel was very informative; he was upbeat the entire time and I could tell he loved what he was doing. I felt as if he was recreating me to attend Life University. However, I didn’t mind because he was hilarious.