Oedipus The King Fate Vs Free Will Essay

1000 Words2 Pages

Words like destiny, fate, and predestination have a much meaning to people today, as countless people believe in it. On the other hand, the belief that a person controls his life has been established as an opposing belief. The book Oedipus the King, a Greek tragedy, written by Sophocles, examines this debate between fate and choice. Although some people argue that the tragedies that took place in Oedipus' life were destined to happen, the grim circumstances that surrounded Oedipus' life were the result of his own free will and the decisions he made about many of these circumstances.
Oedipus had many options after he learned of the Prophecy, and the choice he made to leave Corinth was one of his own free will, showing that destiny was not the …show more content…

Before this instance, Oedipus had just left the Oracle after she told him about the prophecy that stated he will kill his father. Now on the road, at a place where three roads met, Oedipus got into an altercation with a man and his herald. The herald tried to drive Oedipus of the road, and in retaliation, Oedipus killed the herald, the man being driven, and some of his servants (Oedipus the King, 803-813). This happened a small amount of time after Oedipus had just learned of this prophecy that he would kill his father, and also heard a rumor that his father was not Polybus. Instead of refraining himself from hurting others because he might not know who they are, Oedipus made the decision to give himself into rage and kill a number of people. This showed that this was not an act of fate or mindlessly following a prophecy because he had no other decision. Oedipus chose to kill people not because it was his only option, but because he decided …show more content…

By this point in the story Oedipus had already been king of Thebes, for many years, and has earned the love and respect of the Theban people. After the plaque has been ravishing the city for a number of years, Oedipus had Teiresias come to him and tell him who was responsible for the problems in the city. After much prompting, begging and arguing, Teiresias told him he was the person that is causing the problems. Instead of thinking back on his past experiences and realizing that he did kill an older man, who was on the way to the Oracle, which he was coming from, around the same time as the king’s death. Instead Oedipus becomes enraged because he could not do something like that (?). Oedipus made the decision to not listen to the words of someone who was well respected for his prophetic wisdom, and to instead only depend on what he knew. Another example of this is when Oedipus accused Creon of being a traitor and conspiring against him. Oedipus had no evidence of this, and Creon, probably being one of his closest friends, gave him evidence after evidence on why he was not a traitor, but Oedipus ignored all this. Oedipus again depended on what he knew, not what others said. This is all showing that he had control over his life and gave into unwise actions. He decided to do

Open Document