Normative Ethics In Holocaust Research

1059 Words3 Pages

As described by many historians, there were a few discovering to happen after the Second World War, including the Holocaust Experimental Data which was considered as a human normative ethics based on experimental research during the nineteen century. Researchers investigated the set of questions raised in the Jew’s community during and aftermath of the holocaust which allowed them to know with absolute and scientific certainty what was happening inside Nuremberg concentration camps. Most of them proved that horrific Nazi human experiments were conducted on Jewish prisoners against their will, resulting in torture and death, which was considered as a normative ethics on human’s experimentation during nineteen century. These paper will analyze …show more content…

According to the Holocaust historian Saul Friedländer’s testimony, all Jewish were hunted all over the continent, to the very last individual, until the last day of German presence. Identifying the Jews as the enemy of humankind was preached by Adolf Hitler. He said: “we are brought back to a peculiar brand of apocalyptic anti-Semitism, the extraordinary virulence of which remains the only way of explaining both the physical onslaught against all Jews living within the German reach and against any part of human culture created by Jews, or showing any trace of the Jewish spirit” ( Bazyler & Fybel, 2008, P.11). During the Holocaust time, Jewish population suffered very much with Germans’ torture in the Nuremberg concentration camp. They were subject to the Nazi human experimentation which was a series of medical experiments on large numbers of Jewish prisoners, including children. According to Evelyn Shuster’s writing, she proved that “on October 1, 1946, the International Military Tribunal handed down its verdicts in the trials of 22 Nazi leaders, and eleven were given the death penalty, three were acquitted, three were given life imprisonment and four were given imprisonment ranging from ten to twenty years.”(Evelyn Shuster, 1998). She also wrote about “the Nuremberg Code” which was an important document in the history of the ethics of medical research that described the judgment of Nazi doctors accused of conducting the human experiments in the concentration camps. The Nuremberg code is serving as a blueprint for today's principles that ensure the rights of subjects in medical research. Evelyn wrote “Because of its link with the horrors of World War II and the use of prisoners in Nazi concentration camps for medical experimentation, debate continues today about the authority of the Code, its applicability to modern medical research, and

Open Document