Nonviolent Protest Effectiveness

1678 Words4 Pages

Kemisa Doumbia Time is a luxury we don't have. The eight white Clergymen who were the authors of the letter “A Call for Unity” lacked understanding of this concept. The clergymen said that they “recognize[d] the natural impatience of people who feel their hopes are slow in being realized”(Carpenter, C.C.J., et al.). Recognition has two meanings. To recognize, by definition, means “to identify [someone or something] from having encountered them before; it can also mean to acknowledge the existence, validity, or legality of [someone or something]”. The Clergymen’s recognition is surely referring to the latter because they had never encountered the kind of suffering that provokes “the natural impatience of people who feel their hopes are …show more content…

Nonviolent protests such as Gandhi’s Indian independence movement (from Britain) have shown to be highly more effective than violent protest.一Even Though, Gandhi was assassinated, his movement was a success and his legacy lived on; he’s much like King in that way.一 In fact, two women, Erica Chenoweth and Maria J. Stephan did a study on the effectiveness and success rates of nonviolent and violent protest in comparison to each other and wrote a book titled “Why Civil Resistance Works”. The book provides statistics that show that nonviolent protest are a lot more successful than violent protest. Chenoweth and Stephan analyze these statistics alongside results from case studies in different countries. Once they conclude that nonviolent protests are more effective, they proceed to analyze the reason why. They came to the deduced that one reason nonviolent protests are more successful is that more people feel inclined to participate in nonviolent protest because they are not risking their lives or obstructing their values. Another reason they believed nonviolent protests are more successful is that a government is less likely to retaliate against a nonviolent protest because they would lose international support based on conflict of morality. Also, a government overthrown sans violence is more likely to become democratic whereas a government overthrown …show more content…

successfully depicts the hardships that the African Americans had suffered at the hands of their oppressors, reinforcing his rebuttal of the white clergymen’s statement that the demonstrations in Birmingham “unwise and untimely” by showing the urgency of their predicament. He often indicates how time is a factor by showing how long they have been experiencing such oppression to further show the white clergymen why they cannot simply wait around for change. They have to make the changes happen themselves. King describes how merchants were to remove the demeaning, racist signs from store displays, however, “[a]s the weeks and months went by, [they] realized that [they] were the victims of a broken promise”(King.2). After a long period of time, the signs were still not removed. King went on to quote William E. Gladstone, saying that “justice too long delayed is justice denied”. African Americans were indeed denied justice for too long. He was beginning to show the white clergymen that they had waited for results before and got nothing in return. He was showing them that the time for patience is long gone. King further emphasizes that it’s time for him and his fellow colored protesters be given a chance to voice their thoughts and to no longer be oppressed when he says “too long has our beloved Southland been bogged down in a tragic effort to live in monologue rather than dialogue.” (King.3) King often employs the phrase “too long” a few times to

Open Document