Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Police culture and decision making
Use of deadly force police
Use of deadly force police
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Police culture and decision making
weapons are included and there is a higher threat component and additionally general society wrongdoing rate are all ecological variables. Inside, regulatory workings, police association, and typical practices all can effectsly affect an officer's choice too. Two shooting sorts are recognized, "non-elective and elective." (White, 1999) "Non-elective shootings are seen as an officer utilizing lethal power to secure against risk of prompt genuine damage or demise. As the measure of peril confronting the officer diminishes, choices to utilize lethal power turn out to be more elective." (White, 1999) As per exploratory and restorative studies, an immediate connection has been built up in the middle of anxiety and furious, savage conduct. Anxiety
The novel begins with the author’s own experiences as a law enforcement officer and his ideals on the use of deadly force. He explains that “at some deep subconscious level humans are both drawn to and repulsed by violence of any sort” (Klinger, 2004, page 8) and goes on to elaborate why the killing of a human being by an officer is acceptable in the eyes of society today. Even though this truth may seem harsh to some, the overall effects that occur when an officer fires his gun is even harsher when the light of reality is shed upon these gruesome incidences. As the novel continues, Klinger begins to share more information about the career that these few men and women choose to go into. The author describes how many of his interviewees were asked when applying to law enforcement agencies how they would feel about having to shoot someone. Most answered they would not feel any sort of hesitation, yet some men and women in their interviews with the author revealed that they never thought about themselves in that situation and were somewhat taken back by the question. Moreover, Klinger explains that shootings are uncommon incidences in the police...
Over the years, our nation has witnessed countless cases of police brutality. It has developed into a controversial topic between communities. For instance, deindustrialization is the removal or reduction of manufacturing capability or activity can lead to more crimes when people are laid off. Police officers are faced with many threatening situations day-to-day gripping them to make split second decisions; either to expect the worst or hope for the best. The police are given the authority to take any citizen away for their action that can ruin their lives. With that kind of power comes great responsibility, which is one main concern with the amount of discretion officers have is when to use lethal force. The use of excessive force might or
Public mass shootings have increased at an alarming rate over the past three decades and have become a growing concern for the people of the United States. It has appeared that approximately every few months, media outlets report incidences of tragedy involving a sole gunman targeting groups of people with the intent to harm or extinguish life due to various motives. Recent research data indicated that over 80 public mass shootings have occurred in the United States since 1983. Some of the more recent shootings to date are: Marysville-Pilchick High in October 2014; Santa Barbara, California in May 2014; Fort Hood, Texas U.S. Army base in April 2014; Washington Navy Yard in September 2013; Sandy Hook Elementary, Connecticut in December 2012;
Police officers must be trained to shoot with precision; correspondingly, they must not solely be trained to shoot to kill, but also to shoot to simply harm. Once they are taught both ways, they must learn to assess their situation to conclude whether it requires the former or the latter. This is highly important for the reason that it can spare a life, and it easier to prosecute officers who failed to use proper protocol for shooting. Furthermore, this training helps to prevent discrimination against minority groups. Many officers target male minorities; however, when officers do sensitivity training and assess their situation, the officer can keep his fear at bay and civilians will be treated
Family environment and the press are two major influences resulting in the recent tragic school shootings. As much as society continues to focus the killing rampages on factors such as television and music, what children are exposed to in reality contributes to the violence. The most recent school shooting in Michigan involved a six-year-old first grader who killed a classmate with a .22 caliber pistol. The news coverage had vanished after two or three days, and I was left wondering what had happened. Considering the fact that the media wore the Columbine incident out, I wanted to know why they did not pay more attention to this school shooting. As evidence did arrive, it was discovered that the child lived in a household where cocaine, heroin, and many other illegal drugs were commonplace. Also in this “home” guns were easily accessible to the child. Children growing up in this type of environment certainly are likely to be held accountable for future violence. Even though I am against the news media presenting too much school violence, Americans should have been deeply disturbed by this shooting because of the child’s young age. The Michigan shooting should have enlightened Americans to the dilemma we face in this country. Two weeks after the Columbine High School shooting, information on the mass murder was still being broadcast on television. The press was feeding young viewers ideas on how to kill their classmates. News was reported how the teenage murderers acquired information regarding building bombs, obtaining guns, smuggling guns into the school, and proceeding to kill their classmates. A mentally unstable teenager could simply watch these news reports and write a book entitled, “How to Slay Your Classmates”. This onslaught was ridiculous and the news coverage should not have been permitted to continue for countless weeks. Society has determined three reasons on which to blame the shootings. First, the nation blamed it on television’s violent programs. Following that, Americans gave the music recording companies the evil eye as well as attacking the gun manufacturers. All of these reasons involve material objects that are unable to think for themselves. Televisions and CD players do not control themselves, people control them. Finally, boundaries controlling the television programs children view should be set by the parents. The same explanation applies to firearms. How can it be a gun’s fault that a person killed another human being?
Officers are often faced with situations that can result in deadly force against an assailant. To better understand what goes on during a shooting we can look at the psychological principles that play an important role in the operation. The Tempe Study helps us better understand an officer’s trigger-pull reactions and human limitations in the course of lethal force. In the Tempe Study officers for Arizona Police Department were tested on their reaction time and the impact of visual complexity and simple decision making. The officers were tested on five different experiments; however, experiment number three and five will
The authors also explain that there are no real statistics to help explain how many times an officer has used a firearm. The text explains that there is no significant data to help explain police shootings and how many occur each year (Kappeler & Potter, 2005). Most of the data that can be found does not clearly state the numbers of times a firearm was used. Majority of data is found through data bases such as Vital Statistics (Kappeler & Potter, 2005). Even data bases such as Vital Statistics do not provide clear information on police
Either a Police Officer has been shot or a Police Officer has shot a citizen, but either way the final result is death. Whether an Officer has been shot or an Officer has shot someone these cases seem to be related to one thing, fear. People in today’s society feel as though they can’t trust Police Officers as they are there to hurt and kill them. And Police Officers feel as though they are in danger of doing their everyday duties because people see them as the “bad guys” and want to hurt or
Should parents have to be responsible for their kid’s actions? Rachel was the first girl to die in the shooting. The reason why she was important is because she was nice and kind and started a chain reaction. Dylan Keble was a shooter at the school, and he was bullied from middle school till he committed suicide. And Eric Harris was a part of the shooting and he was bullied all high school till he committed suicide.
Over the years, this country has witnessed many cases of police brutality. It has become a controversial topic among communities that have seen police brutality take place in front of their homes. Officers are faced with many threatening situations everyday, forcing them to make split second decisions and to expect the worst and hope for the best. Police officers are given the power to take any citizens rights away and even their lives. With that kind of power comes responsibility, that’s one major concern with the amount of discretion officers have when to use force or when to use lethal force.
using nonlethal weapons because it was faster and used less paper work than a lethal weapon. After a cop discharges a lethal round at an individual then he/she has to fill out a bunch of paper work and has to show up in court to defend their actions.
The officers are taught to always take action first before something bad happens so that means that an officer could shoot a person mistakenly because he think he or she has a gun but along it could be a wallet but all along officers are taught that their safety comes first and use whatever kind of force necessary to make sure that they are safe at the end of the day at all means. But from all the research I did officers are trained what to do at certain situations and which weapon to use in the situations as well because the officers are very important when they are trying to keep the people safe, and arrest the ones that are doing the wrong things as well. (The
Policing relies on the public trust, police legitimacy and accountability, which can be destroyed by unjustifiable police shootings (Squires and Kennninson, 2010). Within this country, there is a recognition that the police do not always adhere to the rule of law (Newburn and Reiner, 2012: 809), which has led to consistent public outrage at the lack of effectiveness and legitimacy the police has maintained. Therefore the deliberate decision to enforce police to attend to the streets unarmed was employed to reassure the public that the police were not to be feared (Waddington and Wright, 2010). Ultimately, concerns derive from the belief that the police are completely ineffective when dealing with gun crimes (Farrell, 1992: 20). However, whilst arming police with guns can act as a protector when on duty it can also cause an increase in police misconduct. This issue will be discussed throughout this essay.
The use of deadly force involving police officers has a lot of attention this past year. In today’s news and social media, there have been more reports and videos of police officers using deadly force on their suspects and how the victims of the police where not a threat. There have been people that were killed and that they had no weapons on them, were mentally challenged, or were just running away and most of the time the police officer will say that it was a necessary use of deadly force. According to sites, like theguardian.com “South Carolina Shooting Raises about how the U.S. has more deaths by cops than any other countries, which is a serious problem, and while on CNN, they found out by Friedman, a civil rights attorney and law professor, that in a case of Walter Scott, who was unarmed and running away, that “the use of deadly force is permitted but conditional”. Therefore, this means
Freud believes that aggression is a primal instinct, and civilization thwarts this instinct, making man unhappy. Civilized society controls man's tendency toward aggression through rules and laws and the presence of authority. These mechanisms are put in place to guarantee safety and happiness for all individuals in a society. However, the necessity of suppressing the aggressive drive in m...