Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Negative effects of urbanization
Advantages and disadvantages of urbanization
New urbanism sprawl
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Negative effects of urbanization
The concept of new urbanism is an “American innovation that first emerged during the 1980’s, as a response to post World War 2 suburban sprawl” (Tredeau, 2013). New urbanism in North America on the surface can be seen as an ideal approach when constructing cities and reinventing our day to day lives. New urbanism’s main objectives include creating compact and walkable neighborhoods, reducing car dependency, and offering a better way of life. New urbanism is about reimaging an urban centre and constructing it to meet our future needs. While cities strive to reach this level of complete communities, that is housing, places of work, parks, entertainment, somewhere along the process they put up a barrier. As cities evolve to provide us with these …show more content…
At the start of my research, most of the material that came up seemed to take a positive approach to new urbanism. Although I found a lot of material on the benefits of new urbanism, I wanted to argue something entirely different. I thought about it for awhile and finally I reached the conclusion that while we are being given all these good amenities, not all people can enjoy them. This realization then led me to refine my way of thinking and eventually I discovered the topic of gentrification. For this paper I wanted to combine both new urbanism and gentrification and bring to light how they can work hand in hand and the negative outcomes of their …show more content…
Once you can do that, you come to the realization that while we are getting all these new things, the price of living is skyrocketing. People can no longer afford to live in the city in which they work and as a result they are pushed out into the suburbs and forced to commute. This is mainly due to developers increasing housing prices to meet urban preferences (Kushner, 2003). “If new urbanist design strategies do in fact succeed at revitalizing urban neighborhoods and cities, property values will begin to rise and people and businesses that once occupied a space may no longer afford to remain there” (Day, 2003). This will cause a further divide in our society and segregation will become the norm. This form of gentrification may eventually cause displacement, leaving lower income individuals to relocate elsewhere. Spaces should be designed in a way that they include everyone and accommodate people’s individual needs. “Our society has a way of segregating individuals based on income, race, and accessibility” (Day, 2003). Adding displacement into the mix will only
All Star word prose because pros seem to outweigh the cons. a pro from gentrification “ the migration of wealthy or people into depressed neighborhoods is a restoration and use of dilapidated buildings, which can have positive spillover effects throughout the community.” (Grabinsky ). this means the people come into the community and start gentrification/ urban renewal process it can act as a chain reaction to more wealthy people coming in to change the community for the better. another pro concerning gentrification is that “ smart gentrification policies may be a good strategy to turn around critically poor neighborhoods in ways that benefit the original population.”(Grabinsky). this quote refers to changing things and really trashed and poor places in order to build that community back up and make make it a better place for the people who have already been living there most of their lives. Akon - gentrification is that it changes the history in the community, The authenticity of the neighborhood , and make a new place and I 'll even tell the same story that it used to.
There has to be a realistic solution that can be put into motion to benefit everyone involved. Referring again to his article “Is Gentrification All Bad?” Davidson argues that urban renewal, if done right, is not a monstrous custom that it is painted to be; nevertheless, he reasons that gentrification depends on who does it, how they do it, and why they do it. As a resident in New York, a city where gentrification is as widespread as the common cold in winter, Davidson speculates that those who go into a neighborhood with the intention to renovate houses, or abandoned buildings ought to have a good reason for it. The author points out that “Gentrification does not have to be something that one group inflicts on another…”
Often, old and abandoned neighborhoods are revamped with new housing and places of entertainment, which increase costs in the area that the wealthy can afford. This is shown in the article, as the old, dilapidated streets of Washington Heights were converted to new places of entertainment and real-estate development. Rent prices in the area increased, and the overall standard of living was greatly uplifted. The process of changing old abandoned townhomes, described as rugged and full of drug dealers into places of new construction such as a hospital and apartment buildings in the area is a perfect example of the effect of gentrification in an area. As the definition reads, gentrification creates improvement, shown numerously throughout the article. The gentrification process that took place created a postmodern structure, increased rent prices, and renovated a vast area. The overall process and idea of renovating Washington Heights, and turning an old, abandoned neighborhoods into place of renovations and entertainment exemplifies gentrification perfectly and serves as a prime example of the process of gentrification occurring in our world
to fund public programs or make general improvements throughout the community. Urban sprawl is expensive not only on people’s wallets, but is taxing on their health, the environment, their relationships. The.. After examining all of the problems associated with urban sprawl it is hard not to question how America lost the genuine communities of old and adopted the new community of
In the United States the hopes and dreams of living a comfortable life is desired. Living comfortably for instance owning or renting a home or apartment that just feels like home. This can be a reality but it depends on where one lives. In the United States people can be evicted or bought out of their home. This is in attempts to modernize an area of the community. Evictions and warnings are issued and it is inevitable to move from a place that one has once called home. Gentrification can be described from a quote in the film Boyz N the Hood. In the film the character Furious Styles (1991) states, “Gentrification Is what happens when property value of a certain area is brought down, they bring the property value down. They can buy the land cheaper. Then they move the people out, raise the value and sell it at a profit.” Gentrification can be proposed as a positive for the community but there can be repercussions. Those who are told and even forced to move out are left to struggle. While wealthy tenants move in, former tenants are left to find a place to stay. The issue of gentrification can be viewed differently from a humanitarian and business standpoint. Gentrification is coming into fruition in places nearby. It is important to know who wins and who loses in the process of
Moses Paul’s article concentrates on the effect of gentrification on low-income urban communities in America. He establishes the point that the negative results ___of it on the residents who have been their for extended periods far outweighs the positive that would “revitalize ” the communities involved. Paul states that “in the case in cities across the country, gentrification comes at the price of displacing poorer people who have stuck it out through the high-crime years” and admits that gentrification’s façade is inviting and and marveling “but at what cost to others?”. Ultimately probing for a solution, Paul makes the claim that the challenge resides in making “the poor
Gentrification is a term that describes the general influx of wealthier people in an existing urban area, an increase in property and rent values, and change in the neighborhood’s culture. After many years of urban population decline, city population is now growing due to the rise of trendy middle and upper class Americans moving into neighborhoods they previously would have avoided. Many people would see this as a chance to bring together groups of people from different races, backgrounds, cultures, and ideas to make improvements in the city; However, there continues to be high levels of inequality and poverty in these areas. Gentrification has caused tension and conflict in many communities where a dynamic and culture had already been established.
The process of gentrification, renovating and improving urban neighborhoods to suit a middle-class lifestyle, may be romanticized to many middle-class individuals, but hold grand consequences to lower-income individuals who originate from urban situations. Individuals come into a neighborhood and buy buildings and apartments to flip them to be higher-quality, thereby raising rent, taxes, and the cost of living. This neighborhood is now unaffordable to those who live there, causing displacement and erasure of urban identity. Those who decide not to move or do not have the means to move are even more impoverished because their rent is too expensive for them to afford much else. Low-income neighborhoods tend to be low income for undesirable reasons,
Gentrification can be defined as the cultural, economic, social, and physical occurrence in which middle to upper class citizens essentially moves into a declining neighborhood/area, at the cost of replacing and/or displacing the original residents. It has been a controversial topic for quite some time now, and the debate for it only continues to grow. On one side, there are those who say the process is a beneficial one, describing it as something that makes cities safer, nicer to live in, and economic value. This is understandable, since an area that goes through gentrification is “renewed” in a sense. However, this is a very superficial way of thinking. While gentrification may have its benefits, I believe this system of renovation is largely
Gentrification fundamentally alters the culture and character of the neighborhood in ways that hurt the poor. The social, economic, and physical impacts of gentrification often result in serious political conflict, got worse by differences in race, class, and culture. Earlier residents may feel ignored, and excluded from their own communities. On the other hand, as a result of the gentrification, the security situation may be improved because land prices increase and the crime rates
Quickened procedures of urbanization in the twenty-first century, as we have seen, are to a great extent moved in urban areas in creating nations, and the greater part of these new urban natives are living in informal or illicit advancements. Urban design, then again, moves past the investigation of space; it is the act of effectively forming the city in a wanted manner (Németh, 2010). It is evident that urban communities can frequently be overpowering places, and that we require a decided state of mind and clear center so as to explore their complexities. Urban originators enhance the livability of urban communities by making an interpretation of arrangements into physical systems, setting up configuration criteria for advancement ventures,
The term gentrification has different meanings and interpretations depending on whom is being asked to define the issue. While the intensity of process can vary drastically, the definition as defined by the sociologist that coined the phrase is "the process of renewal and rebuilding accompanying the influx of middle-class or affluent people into deteriorating areas that often displaces poorer residents" (Nicholson, 2009). Gentrification is not an inherently bad thing, gentrification can actually be very beneficial to an area when implemented correctly. Although gentrification can lead to a better quality of life, in most situations gentrification has resulted in cultural degradation, displacement destruction of small businesses, class division, and racial division.
“Gentrification within cities has been attributed to an array of coalescing factors including the rise of a service economy, increasing preference for urban living, widening ‘rent gaps’, and growth of nontraditional households.” (P. Nelson & A. Oberg;2010) Gentrification does not necessarily have a positive demeanor when it comes to how the low income residents in these areas that are being affected by gentrification speak about it. To them, gentrification is just another way to discriminate and or segregate people based on socioeconomic status. “… the term gentrification within both urban and rural studies has been seen to signify a change in the social composition of an area with members of a middle-class group replacing working class residents”. (Nelson & Oberg, 2010) Before claiming that the only outcomes of gentrification are negative, there are also positive outcomes. Gentrification not only “beautifies” deteriorating neighborhoods but also bring with it other positive aspects. Gentrification brings in safer streets. “For 11 years, crime rates in L.A. have generally dropped, many argue as a result of gentrification…” (Tarvana & Simpson, 2015) For example, in Los Angeles, gang and crime activity has decreased significantly in areas that are now gentrified. Gentrifications helps with improving the economy. With gentrification comes job opportunities. The people that are
Our cities are not what they used to be. Over the corse of fifty years the once proud, strong, and viable hubs of American economic prowess are but a shell of what they were built for. The problems that many cities have are no longer condensed to their city limits and the sprawl that was created over that fifty year period is now threatening to enter the suburban spaces that were created when the city’s citizens left. The metro sprawl is starting to loose it’s attractiveness and unless there is more acknowledgment of the problems creeping out of these cities, the same declining trends will create unoccupied commercial and residential districts not unlike the downtowns of many American cities. Without careful discussion about these trends and our communities embracement of a more regional approach, then there will be more problems in less dense suburban areas, making those problems hard to correct. In order to prevent the spread of this urban blight and avoid low occupancy rates, communities must implement regional tax policies, plan for more effective use of space, and encourage smart growth.