Netflix Vs. Bank Of America

1733 Words4 Pages

Companies need to be very aware of how their decisions will play out in the public. Gone are the days when consumers, if upset at a price increase imposed by a company, could merely express their displeasure by not buying the product or by choosing a competitor. In the 21st century, consumers have much more influence. They can post on Facebook or aim a well-crafted tweet about a product and they can influence hundreds or even thousands of people. Social media campaigns against a company can take on a life of its own. This phenomenon means that companies must be very careful to present large pricing changes and policies in the best light possible and to be ready for the backlash that might follow. Netflix and Bank of America are two companies …show more content…

The leaders of the company knew that they needed to increase revenue in order to be able to provide more content for their streaming service (Wingfield, 2011). By splitting the two services DVD and streaming content apart, Netflix was able to use the profit the DVD service provided, to help fund the increased content the streaming side would need to provide in order to become successful in the future. The splitting of the two services also served to encourage the subscribers to choose one service or the other—and most of them chose the steaming service. Netflix was able to transition these subscribers to their streaming service before a competitor online provider could lure them away (Hartung, 2013). Netflix felt that the streaming service was the future of the company and therefore they needed to make the decisions that would align themselves for that future. Netflix knew that their price increase was inline with prices being charged by other streaming services such as Hulu. The similarity in price for possible substitutes supports NetFlix’s decision to raise prices even when demand was elastic. Therefore, they apologized for how they handled the price increase but they kept …show more content…

By the next year, they had gained back the subscribers who left in protest of the changes in services and the price increase. By the end of 2012, the number of subscriptions had increased to 33.27 million. Growth, both domestic and international has continued since then. Total number of subscribers for 2016 was over 93 million people (Dunn, 2017). Recently, Netflix increased its prices again. This time however, the company did a better job of explaining why they were raising prices to the public. The company explained that exclusive content and movies have been added to the Netflix lineup as well as an overall improved experience. The consumers have been more accepting of the price change because the Netflix service still appears to be a good value when compared to their competitors (Netflix Price Rise Tests Demand, 2017). Because of this perceived value, Netflix demand is inelastic. Netflix is a leader in the online streaming providers. They are now a global company, available in over 130 countries. Netflix produces award winning original content that is ONLY available through their service. By increasing the content that they produce themselves they are able to reduce the amount that they have to spend in acquiring expensive content from other sources. This in turn has decrease their content cost per subscriber and increased their profit margin (Why Netflix’s Financials are Better Than You

More about Netflix Vs. Bank Of America

Open Document