Nature Of Work Essay

1561 Words4 Pages

The nature of work has been assumed to be indefinable by social theorists for centuries, due to the ever-changing organisation of work, and its' increasing power in the relationship between an individual and their society. The actual concept of work can be defined by Giddens as the "carrying out of tasks, involving the expenditure of mental and physical effort, which have as their objective the production of goods and services catering for human needs" - therefore, it does not solely involve occupational work, which is work completed in exchange for a wage. This also implies that other essential forms of work, such as housework and voluntary work do not receive due credit, and as seen as unequal next to an occupation. The changing nature of work, especially in the United Kingdom, is evident in the process of industrialisation – specifically the Industrial Revolution during the nineteenth century which saw a huge increase in standard of living as more moved to the cities for occupational work, and the creation of an “urban culture”. A second revolution occurred as automation increasingly occurs, as well as a change from manual into the service industry as other countries become more competitive in the field – this change has meant a huge increase in unemployment for people who previously been prospering in a country where manual labour like mining and manufacturing were the main industries. One of the first sociological theories was developed by Emile Durkheim, and is known as Functionalism. The consensus structural theory looks at society using the organic analogy, explaining society as being dependent on a healthy relationship between social structures - for example, the institution of work and education are interdependent as if... ... middle of paper ... ... and the quantity of capital has become how individuals define success, rather than the quality of it. Ritzer defined four main dimensions of his concept - the first being effiency, wherein the optimum time for completion is set, denying any sense of autonomy. Calculability is the second dimension, the confirmation that the target is calculated according to quantity over quality. Predictability, including the insurance that the same process can be reproduced with the same outcome - denying any specialisation for workers, reducing them to cogs in a machine which can be replaced with relative ease. The fourth dimension is control, mainly concerning the reduction of human labour in exchange for technological labour - deskilling the work force almost completely, for example people who used to make the hamburgers, would now oversee the machine which makes the hamburgers.

Open Document