Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Dilemmas about abortion
Dilemmas about abortion
Reasons why abortion should be illegal
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Dilemmas about abortion
Natural Law Ethics Is a legal theory that recognizes law and morality as deeply connected.
Morality conveys the idea of what is right and wrong and what is good and bad. Natural law theorists believe that human laws are defined by morality, and not by an authority figure, like a King or a government.
You can apply natural Law Ethics when it comes to religion, one example of that would be abortion.
Some feel as though when a pregnant women is put in the position of losing her life, it is irrational and brutal that she is to die so that her unborn child can live. This is also an issue in cases of rape and incest.
In contrast, many argue that abortion can never be rationalized, as it is truly immoral to kill an unborn child, as it is an innocent
Imagine…the birth of a human being into the world. 9 months of endless anticipation leading to someone’s first chance at seeing the world for the first time. While some enjoy the result of a pregnancy, leading to a new human being entering life, some are not so fond, or just can’t be in such a situation. Abortion is the supposed “cure” to this problem and is, for the most part, done safely. However, one of the factors stopping someone from committing an abortion is the consideration of moral status on the child.
In our society, there are many ethical dilemmas that we are faced with that are virtually impossible to solve. One of the most difficult and controversial issues that we are faced with is abortion. There are many strong arguments both for and against the right to have an abortion which are so complicated that it becomes impossible to resolve. The complexity of this issue lies in the different aspects of the argument. The essence of a person, rights, and who is entitled to these rights, are a few of the many aspects which are very difficult to define. There are also issues of what circumstances would justify abortion. Because the issue of abortion is virtually impossible to solve, all one can hope to do is understand the different aspects of the argument so that if he or she is faced with that issue in their own lives, they would be able to make educated and thoughtful decisions in dealing with it.
Of the millions of pregnancies that happen every year, almost half of those pregnancies are aborted. What some people do not know is that abortion is murder; the life of an innocent, unborn baby is being ended because the mother does not want that child. Many people say that the baby is unaware of what is going and they do not feel anything; when really, a baby can feel pain just days after conception. A baby is a baby; it still has arms, legs, and a functioning brain just like the rest of us do. So why are these babies getting murdered? Life begins immediately after conception; Abortion is wrong because it is murder, a “quick getaway” and it is a cheaper way for irresponsible women to not have to take care of someone. There are other options that do not involve murder.
Natural law is this idea that from nature we can deduce certain things, how things are, and how they should be. Natural law is a theory of an existence of a law that is set by nature and that it applies to all because it is rooted within our beings. Natural law is a clear-cut approach to morality and it established the common rational rules of society. The law of nature is written within human beings hearts, engaged, and imprinted in our nature from the beginning of existence. It is the order of natural beings that are capable of rational, moral actions, knowledge and truth. Natural law is the voice of rationality and reason and by using our logic and reason we are obeying the eternal law or God and his creation of doing good and avoiding evil. Natural law doesn’t judge on the outcome of an action rather than the action itself and the reasoning behind it as whether it was good. It is a law dependent on human reason that Aristotle, Plato, and Cicero had their discovered and had their philosophies on the subject, yet Aquinas borrowed some of their ideas and developed this more into the theory of a moral code of conduct.
Personally, I see abortion as a silent murder. A fetus already has its own DNA that no other human being will ever have. That’s proof that the child is unique and has a purpose! My question is, “How can someone be heartless to kill their own child?” If someone doesn’t have children, they should not have sex. Period. A gift from exchanging sexual energy is pregnancy. Granting s...
Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle were the first to hint at the natural law theory. They knew that law was different place to place but that “nature” was the same everywhere. Aristotle (BC 384-322) is considered the father of the “natural law” (“Natural Law”). Thomas Aquinas (1225-1274) made it to what the Roman Catholic Church today uses. The theories views of abortion, homosexuality, euthanasia and other controversial issues are used in the church (Vaughn 109). Many people, religious or not, believe that people can figure out moral rules and live a moral
Lewis (2001) in Mere Christianity pertaining to the Laws of Human Nature. The natural law theory contends, “…that morality somehow is embodied in nature and that there are “natural laws” that human beings must adhere to if they are to be moral (Thiroux & Krasemann, 2012, p. 12). Lewis suggests, that “Something” which directs the all elements in the universe also guides, laws within mankind, urging good actions, and causing discomfort when engaged in immoral behavior. Lewis (2001) differentiates between the archetypal behavior observed in humans, and the behavior that humans ought to employ, stating “the moral law is about what we ought to do.” As evidenced by the timeline of ethical thought, and as presented in the artifact, concepts of morality and immorality change over time, in adherences to cultural standards, beliefs and political regimes. Immorality is ubiquitous, inescapable and reoccurring; and aspirations of good or decent behavior often parallel the occurrence perceived
Aborting an unborn fetus is not an activity that happens once and it is done, it continues to dwell on all of the individuals involved with the process. Abortion is a cruel action to perform and has other options. Individuals who are pro-life consider the fact that even as a young fetus, it is a human being. Abortion is a very controversial topic. There are many different aspects to consider before receiving an abortion; cultural opinions, psychological effects on the woman, and the termination of an already developing fetus. Abortion not only takes away individual tissues forming, it has the potential to take away a future friend, sibling or spouse.
Abortion is the deliberate termination of human pregnancy resulting in the expulsion of the human fetus. Infanticide is the crime of killing a child within a year of birth. Abortion is legal in all states of America while infanticide is illegal, because it is considered an act of murder. Murder as defined by the Merriam-Webster Dictionary, is the crime of one person unlawfully killing another person. Murder is always seen as morally wrong. In America’s current society infanticide is considered immoral always because it constitutes as murder while abortion is debatable and accepted by many. Before determining whether abortion or infanticide is morally permissible or impermissible one must determine what renders something of being a person. As the definition stated, murder is when a “person” is killed by another person. Would it still be considered murder if something was not fully a person. This paper will discuss the question of the morality of
Obeying by the natural law theory is the only true and moral way to live life; especially a life lived in God’s image. God’s presence is a guiding factor to obtaining a moral and virtuous life, which can only be obtained by following the natural law theory. God created a set of laws as a supreme guide for humans to live life, like any law these laws were created to ensure wellbeing for everyone. The laws he created are the civil law, the natural law and the divine law God created them from a law much superior than the rest, one which only God himself has the knowledge of, the eternal law. Humans actively participate in the eternal law of God by using reason in conformity with the Natural Law to discern what is good and evil(Magee 1). Of these laws the natural law is the most vital, the natural law uses nature as a guide to morality and humanity, to decipher the right from the wrong, and the moral from the immoral. “ natural law theory is a theory about the relationship between morality and human nature, the theory that who we are determines how we ought to act”(Holt 1). Nature is a definitive guide to use when deciding what is appropriate and how God would want life to be lived. Natural law is used by using reason to develop knowledge of life and oneself. The natural law theory is the only way to attain a moral life and can be proven as a valid theory when the existence of god is proven, the explanation of nature being a guiding factor to morality is explained, and proving the theory with examples of how the ethics are applied.
According to pro-life arguments, some of the reasons people are against abortion is because they view abortion as murder because life begins at conception, which means unborn babies are human beings from the beginning. Another argument is that the fetus can feel pain during an abortion and there are plenty of arguments against abortion regarding religion. The abortion is murder opinion is a popular one, individuals justify it by saying the fetus and mother are two different individuals; with that being said, the mother should not have a choice to abort the baby, because it is a separate being. Although science shows the fetus develops features fairly early in the pregnancy that make it seem more human, the fetus is still inside the woman’s body and what she wants to do with that fetus should be her choice.
Abortion “is an issue that raises questions about life and death, about what a person is and when one becomes a person, about the meaning of life, about the rights of women, and about the duties of men”(Velasquez 485). Abortion is an unresolved ethical issue that has been in doubt for many years because one can argue that you are killing an innocent person/fetus but many argue that is not person because they don’t have a conscious or the characteristics that defines a “person”. John Stuart Mill in a way justifies abortion, Mill is known to be openly speak about women’s rights and about human rights. Although, it might be immortal to end someone’s life one might argued that the individual has the right to choose and have the option. But in
The Theory of Natural Law, defined in three aspects, there being a natural order in the world, everything having a purpose and how things are and how things ought to be. This theory also states that humans can distinguish between what is right or wrong through human reason/moral knowledge. On the other hand, the Divine Command Theory is a view of morality and believes that what’s right or wrong is set by God’s moral commands. God’s commands tell us what is morally obligatory, permitted and wrong.
Both law and morality serve to regulate behaviour in society. Morality is defined as a set of key values, attitudes and beliefs giving a standard in which we ‘should’ behave. Law, however, is defined as regulating behaviour which is enforced among society for everyone to abide by. It is said that both, however, are normative which means they both indicate how we should behave and therefore can both be classed as a guideline in which society acts, meaning neither is more effective or important than the other. Law and morals have clear differences in how and why they are made. Law, for example, comes from Parliament and Judges and will be made in a formal, legal institution which result in formal consequences when broken. Whereas morals are formed under the influence of family, friends, media or religion and they become personal matters of individual consciences. They result in no formal consequence but may result in a social disapproval which is shown also to occur when breaking the law.
The age old question of whether abortion is legal, ethical, and or moral etc., has always been around because there is no clear answer to this question. To me, and to many, this question will not and does not have a clear yes or no answer to it. Although, if we are using Natural Law Theory to answer this question, it is clear that the legalization of abortion violates natural law theory. Natural law theory contends that “one may never directly intend to kill an innocent human being. So, is it morally permissible for a woman to seek an abortion and is it morally permissible for a doctor to perform the procedure?