The video is of President Bush when he is signing the Bill for the “Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act” from the White House on the 17th of Dec, 2004. A key point that I took away from this video is with the Presidents opening statement, “In a few minutes, I will sign into law the most dramatic reform of our nation's intelligence capabilities since President Harry S. Truman signed the National Security Act of 1947. “ The reason that I feel that this statement is so profound is that it took a stateside terrorist attack to realize that there was a discrepancy with the way that the intelligence community operated. In these times many can not go two years without the need to purchase the next big thing. The way that any community has positive progression is by reviews and improvements. Not only did the intelligence community change 55 years, but the way that society started a change to the entitlement generation where society now feels as if they are entitled to information regardless of the impact to national security. In 1947 the internet and social media was not as widely used as it is today with even the President “Tweeting” and posting on “Facebook”. When we look at the act of human collections in 1947 the agent was required to possibly get as close as possible to the target to obtain source information. Now days the agent can be at a stand-off range with a laser listening device that not only will record all communication but will also record that same information. How can the intelligence community remain ethical under stipulations set forth by President Truman who was concerned about potential state sponsored attacks? The attacks of 9/11 elevated the use of Human Intelligence (HUMINT) Collections... ... middle of paper ... ...o may have been unethical, but do to the lack of social leaks these unethical actions may never be revealed. Today’s officers need to be planned out with every precaution already in place. Works Cited Headquarter, Department of the Army. “FM2-22.3 Human Intelligence Collector Operations”. Department of the Army. September 2006. Cosh, Colby and National Post. "The Necessity of HUMINT." National Post (f/k/a the Financial Post) (Canada), May 30, 2008. A12. Mazzetti, Mark. "Blurring Line between Spy and Diplomat." The New York Times, November 29, 2010. 1. Shuster, Bud. "Hi-Tech Vs. Human Spying." The Washington Times, February 11, 1992. F3. TIMES,Daniel Gallington , SPECIAL TO THE WASHINGTON. "What Hope for HUMINT ?" The Washington Times, May 9, 2006. A16. http://www.politicalvideo.org/george-bush-signs-intelligence-reform-and-terrorism-prevention-act
Renaud and Kyle Balda. USA Today. Gannett Co. Inc, 02 Mar. 2012. Web. 09 Dec. 2013.
Sulick, Michael J.. Spying in America espionage from the Revolutionary War to the dawn of the Cold War., Georgetown University Press, 2012
Washington Times - Politics, Breaking News, US and World News. 6 Jan. 2010. Web. 16
Rimer, S (2000). A lost moment recaptured. New York Times. January 9, 2000, 22 – 23 and 40.
...e community have had conflicting views and opposing agendas. Lack of cooperation and communication between intelligence agencies; such as the FBI and the CIA refusing to share information prior to the terrorist attacks of 2001, resulted in limited information and failure on the part of the intelligence community and policy decisions regarding US safeguards against terrorist.
Caruso, David. "The Washington Post."Washington Post. The Washington Post, 27 June 2007. Web. 5 Dec. 2013.
Spaulding’s background and qualifications to comment on the USA Patriot Act are beyond reproach and not questioned by either party. Her criticism focuses most directly upon the sharing of information and the removal of the wall between what was formally accepted as a given withy that sharing- that there was a need to distance and prohibit the wall between law enforcement and intelligence entities, whether that be the CIA, the DIA, or the NSA. She elaborates, but the issue, while detailed and correct, boils down to the need for a separation between the information ostensible gathered in the ‘war on terror’ in all its guises, and the normal everyday law enforcement information
Maybe someone may not know who Eric Holder, Janet Napolitano, and James Clapper are. In 2009, Eric Holder became Attorney General in America, and he is the first African American Attorney General in history (Eric Holder, p.1). Janet Napolitano was secretary of Homeland Security under President Obama (2009-2013) (Janet Napolitano, p.1). And James Clapper is now the fourth Director of National Intelligence (dni.gov). These basic information let us know that they have a very high authority to talk about the improvement after
...e officers argued that, the lives of officers would be in danger they were unsuccessful to provide evidence for their arguments. Not being able to provide the evidence jeopardized their arguments. I believe that the public has the right to know about the misconducts and unlawful activities of the officers. I also believe that their identities be kept private. I feel this way because the public does not necessarily need to know the officers names and other personal information. By just knowing the officers last names and their activities are enough. We have not seen instances were officers have gotten harm because of their release of information, but what about if it happens one day. Are we going to wait until something like that happens to stop releasing certain information? I believe we should put certain restrictions when releasing officers’ information.
New York Times. 21 Nov. 1995, New York, NY: A1. ProQuest. George Mason University, Fenwick Library. 22 Nov. 2004.
Munro, Richard. “Kim Philby Had a Remarkably Long Career with British Intelligence - Spying for the Other Side.” Intrigue, June 2001.
Headquarters, Department of the Army (29 August 2007), FM 3-11.20 Technical Escort Battalion Operations, pgs 1-1 thru 2-14
National terrorism has been the focus of attention since September 11. But now domestic terrorism is becoming increasingly common among hate groups across the nation. Domestic terrorism can be defined as visible crime, or “street crime.” These acts would consist of violent crimes, (acts against people in which injury or death results) property crimes (acts that threaten property held by individuals or the state) and public order crimes. (acts that threaten the general well-being of society and challenger accepted moral principles) It can also however be described as political crime, (criminal acts by or against the government for ideological purposes) which would include the 9/11 and the Oklahoma City bombing.
Essay National security once meant a strong dollar, a strong border and the confidence of a people in their government. Now, maintaining our national security depends upon our ability to communicate effectively in other languages and across cultures. A new definition of national security strategy is emerging that must confront issues across the spectrum from dictators to disease, from nation-states to stateless movements, from foreign to domestic battlefields and from outer space to cyberspace. Policymakers must be correctly informed to protect the homeland and to advance and protect American interests abroad. Our national security purview now encompasses environmental security, military security, political security, and security of energy and natural resources around the globe.
... the office know about this and we had to maintain the confidentiality of the investigation as well. But, in general terms, it was our duty and obligation to follow the rules of the organization that we swore to support.