Narcotics Anonymous Case Study

1465 Words3 Pages

Narcotics Anonymous Narcotics Anonymous (NA) is a support group that helps individuals with the process of recovery from the disease of addiction. Whether they share the same drug addiction or not, it is open for those who seek a clean way of living. The only requirement for this support group is the "desire to stop using" (pamphlet). At the same time, NA strongly believes that "fellowship and support of other clean addicts really help [as they] begin to rely on them for the reassurance they so desperately need" (pamphlet). As a group, they work together to find new ways to support one another. With that said, their goal is to engage each addict into a safe and encouraging network that will help them throughout the recovery process. A "recovery …show more content…

Both groups can be seen as open systems because they "do not always maintain a steady state but [they are] constantly developing and moving towards a steady state or hemostasis" (Posthuma, 2002, p. 18). Moreover, group development can be evaluated from three stages. While both groups go through these stages, self-help groups experience them in a different way when compared to therapeutic groups. The three stages of group development are the pre-commitment, commitment, and termination …show more content…

The process is also experienced differently because new people are added to the group on a daily basis. For example, given that not every person experiences each stage at the same time, I was on a different stage than everyone else because I only attended one meeting. However, since therapeutic groups usually do not add people until the group has terminated, individuals are able to experience each stage in the process. In the therapeutic group, I saw how the group developed from being superficial-oriented in conversations to be very personal and growth-promoting. On another note, the NA meeting did not rely on the group leader to direct the meeting. In fact, the group leader did not engage in an authoritative role. The meeting was basically led by the group members. Whereas the therapeutic group, the leader seems to have more authority in the beginning and as the group develops, the members tend to depend on less on the group

Open Document