Nanook Of The North Analysis

583 Words2 Pages

According to the article “The Documentary Film and the New Media” states that a traditional classification of documentaries is related to the ratio in which the publishing material and cinematic substance of the film occur. (The Documentary Film and the New Media) Documentaries are usually shown as a one-way communication receptor to the audience, meaning that there is no interaction between what is being display and the audience. Documentary attempts to portray the impartial truth but instead take a partisan viewpoint and present the truth to the audiences, which ultimately results in social and emotional manipulations. (JFK Reloaded) Documentaries are like movies where is a story being told in a cinematic way. Taking this into account documentaries are sub grouped into three different category documentary movie, documentary theme, and news documentary. A documentary movie relies heavily on the expressive principles and merits of the creative cinematic image. This type of documentary …show more content…

Robert Flaherty’s 1922 documentary Nanook of the North struggles between reality and fiction. Nanook of the North is a documentary that follows an Inuit family and their constant battles to survive the harsh artic climate. Before Robert Flaherty had started filming and capturing footage of the family he studied their actions and daily routines to arrange activities of relevance to the overall narrative to be re-enacted on film and to fake certain scenes to get certain camera shots. And when it came time to edit the film Robert Flaherty would make the illusion that everything was filmed in real-time and not temporarily fixed in order to get a certain emotional reaction. While Robert Flaherty’s Nanook of the North claims to be a documentary that has a genuine true story, this in fact contradicts itself by proving it’s a misrepresentation of the truthful and objective form. (JFK

Open Document