Nadav Kander Yangtze Analysis

806 Words2 Pages

Nadav Kander’s photographic gallery Yangtze – The Long River catalogues the everyday living environment the Chinese live along the Yangtze River. Kander claims:
“China is a nation that appears to be severing its roots by destroying its past. Demolition and construction were everywhere on such a scale that I was unsure if what I was seeing was being built or destroyed, destroyed or built ... And yet, paradoxically, the Chinese have traditionally had a deep identification with their native soil and an attachment to place.”
I believe that there is a deeper message that Kander is trying to get at despite his current claim. After looking at a few of his photograph, I began to notice a recurring theme among some of his art. All the people seemed …show more content…

Sure one can see the hillside and maybe a few buildings here and there, but nothing can really be made out due to the amount of smog in the area. This resembles the concealed nature of the inside of China. Kander further shows this comparison with many other motifs within his photo Sunday Afternoon. Moving back into focus on the people in the foreground, the people eating at the river bank would seem just like any other family picnic in many countries, but the looming bridge over the people along the river bank is what makes it different from what other family picnics would look like. I believe that Kander is trying to show that the Chinese government is controlling and “looming” over the nation’s people. Not only that, there is even more symbolism in the bridge itself. By closely looking at the bridge, the foundations of the bridge are poorly maintained and further structure of the bridge is dirty and rotten. This is most likely more symbolism as to what the Chinese government closely resembles towards other nations. The Chinese people see the bridge as a strong sturdy bridge, but an outside viewer will view this bridge as being improperly maintained. In addition to this, it almost seems as if the paint that is chipping off the bottom of the pillars look like scratch marks as if people clawed at them in attempt to climb up and escape the hell that they are in, yet the people have either accepted their fate or have simply forgotten what freedom actually is in reality. In addition to this, Kander has shown that there is no way to get up onto the bridge from down below. This most likely symbolizes the fact that the common folk are stuck at ground zero with not escape from their class structure while the government will continuously maintain control over its people with no concern of losing their

Open Document